MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/icl.0000000000000883

Медицинская библиотека · Eye & contact lens · 2022

Microorganisms and Antibiotic Resistance of Bacterial Keratitis at a Rural County Hospital in Seville.

Lorente Pascua José, García Bernal Ana, Garcia Sanchez Estefania, Almeida González Carmen V

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To review the incidence, resistance patterns, and management of bacterial keratitis during the past 4 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of microbiological isolates from patients with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial keratitis.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients were analyzed, and 102 microorganisms were isolated from 129 cultures. In these cultures, 23.7% of the microorganisms were gram positive, 60.8% were gram negative, and 15.5% were fungi. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common bacteria (9.2%), followed by Serratia marcescens (4.4%) and Staphylococcus aureus (4%). Resistance to fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides was found to be 23.1% and 53.1% in gram-positive and 2.8% and 13.9% in gram-negative bacteria, respectively. Resistance to ceftazidime against gram-negative bacteria was 13.9%. No resistance to vancomycin was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

A high resistance rate to aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones was observed in gram-positive bacteria. We concluded that fluoroquinolones or aminoglycosides may not be suitable for initial monotherapy in patients with severe bacterial keratitis.

Для цитирования: Lorente Pascua José, García Bernal Ana, Garcia Sanchez Estefania, Almeida González Carmen V. Microorganisms and Antibiotic Resistance of Bacterial Keratitis at a Rural County Hospital in Seville.. Eye & contact lens. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/icl.0000000000000883.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.