Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2013
Intraoperative use of a gamma probe for the treatment of condylar hyperplasia: description of a new technique.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bouchard Carl, Paris Melinda, Villemaire Jean-Marc
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to describe a new technique to perform a high condylectomy using a γ-probe.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 15-year-old female patient presented with right condylar hyperplasia. Because the condition was active, a high condylectomy was performed to stop the abnormal growth of the affected condyle. To resect an adequate amount of bone and prevent relapse, a γ-probe was used to guide bone removal. The patient was injected with technetium-99m methylene diphosphate 25 mCi 2 hours before she was brought to the operating room. Bone was removed from the superior aspect of the right condyle until the reading with the γ-probe was equivalent to normal bone.
RESULTS: Seven millimeters of bone was removed from the top of the condyle before the γ-emission from the remaining condyle was equivalent to the mandibular parasymphysis used as a control. No relapse was noted 9 months after surgery.
CONCLUSION: The γ-probe may help a surgeon remove the correct amount of bone when performing a high condylectomy, especially in type II (vertical pattern) condylar hyperplasia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 15-year-old female patient presented with right condylar hyperplasia. Because the condition was active, a high condylectomy was performed to stop the abnormal growth of the affected condyle. To resect an adequate amount of bone and prevent relapse, a γ-probe was used to guide bone removal. The patient was injected with technetium-99m methylene diphosphate 25 mCi 2 hours before she was brought to the operating room. Bone was removed from the superior aspect of the right condyle until the reading with the γ-probe was equivalent to normal bone.
RESULTS: Seven millimeters of bone was removed from the top of the condyle before the γ-emission from the remaining condyle was equivalent to the mandibular parasymphysis used as a control. No relapse was noted 9 months after surgery.
CONCLUSION: The γ-probe may help a surgeon remove the correct amount of bone when performing a high condylectomy, especially in type II (vertical pattern) condylar hyperplasia.