The impact of unified discharge standards on the clinical efficacy and prognosis of hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with hip fractures.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of unified discharge standards on the clinical efficacy and prognosis of hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with hip fractures.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 158 elderly patients with hip fractures who underwent artificial femoral head replacement in our hospital from March 2016 to July 2019 were enrolled. According to the unified discharge standards, patients were divided into the observation (65 cases who met discharge criteria) and control group (93 cases who failed to meet all discharge criteria). Histopathological feature, operation status, postoperative Harris Hip score, therapeutic outcome, postoperative complications, readmission and mortality rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Surgery duration and intraoperative blood loss exhibited no difference between the two groups, while transfusion volume and length of hospital stay were significantly increased in the observation group. There was no significant difference in the Harris Hip score between the two groups 12 months postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative complications during the follow-up period was notably lower in the observation group. In addition, the three-month readmission rate and one-year mortality rate were significantly lower in the observation group.

CONCLUSIONS

For elderly patients with hip fractures undergoing artificial femoral head replacement, the incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative readmission/mortality rate could be reduced through the establishment of unified discharge standards, which should be used in future clinical practice.