The American journal of sports medicine · 2014
Squatting mechanics in people with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the influence of graft type.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bell David R, Kulow Stephanie M, Stiffler Mikel R, Smith Mason D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Single-legged squat mechanics change after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and rehabilitation, but it is unclear if changes in squat mechanics are graft specific.
PURPOSE: To investigate graft differences in biomechanics of the knee, hip, and trunk during the single-legged squat in patients with ACL-reconstructed knees, determine if these factors were associated with deficits in knee extension moment, and determine if subjective knee function and squat biomechanics are related.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 106 individuals were grouped based on surgical status and graft type (51 control, 34 bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB], 21 ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis autograft [ISGA]). Motion capture interfaced with force plates was used to capture single-legged squat performance in the ACL reconstructed and dominant control limbs. Variables were captured at peak knee flexion.
RESULTS: Controls exhibited greater knee extension moment (P = .04), knee flexion (P = .002), and hip adduction angles (P = .04) compared with the reconstructed groups. The ISGA group demonstrated greater forward (P = .01) and lateral (P = .002) trunk flexion over the reconstructed limb. Summated extension moment did not differ between groups (P = .42). Knee extension moment was correlated with lateral trunk flexion (r = -0.31, P = .03) in the control group and knee flexion angle (r = -0.44, P = .04) in the ISGA group. Subjective knee function scores were correlated with lateral trunk flexion (r = -0.45, P = .008) in the BPTB group and with hip adduction angle (r = -0.46, P = .04) and hip extension moment (r = 0.48, P = .03) in the ISGA group.
CONCLUSION: Knee and hip biomechanics were related to surgical status but not graft type. Increased forward and lateral trunk motion in the ISGA group may be a mechanism to protect the knee by minimizing motion during squatting or related to surgical selection bias. Secondary findings (summated extensor moments and correlations) most likely represent a strategy to shift the squat demands from the knee to the hip.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should target these neuromuscular deficits during rehabilitation and training programs after ACL reconstruction.
PURPOSE: To investigate graft differences in biomechanics of the knee, hip, and trunk during the single-legged squat in patients with ACL-reconstructed knees, determine if these factors were associated with deficits in knee extension moment, and determine if subjective knee function and squat biomechanics are related.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 106 individuals were grouped based on surgical status and graft type (51 control, 34 bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB], 21 ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis autograft [ISGA]). Motion capture interfaced with force plates was used to capture single-legged squat performance in the ACL reconstructed and dominant control limbs. Variables were captured at peak knee flexion.
RESULTS: Controls exhibited greater knee extension moment (P = .04), knee flexion (P = .002), and hip adduction angles (P = .04) compared with the reconstructed groups. The ISGA group demonstrated greater forward (P = .01) and lateral (P = .002) trunk flexion over the reconstructed limb. Summated extension moment did not differ between groups (P = .42). Knee extension moment was correlated with lateral trunk flexion (r = -0.31, P = .03) in the control group and knee flexion angle (r = -0.44, P = .04) in the ISGA group. Subjective knee function scores were correlated with lateral trunk flexion (r = -0.45, P = .008) in the BPTB group and with hip adduction angle (r = -0.46, P = .04) and hip extension moment (r = 0.48, P = .03) in the ISGA group.
CONCLUSION: Knee and hip biomechanics were related to surgical status but not graft type. Increased forward and lateral trunk motion in the ISGA group may be a mechanism to protect the knee by minimizing motion during squatting or related to surgical selection bias. Secondary findings (summated extensor moments and correlations) most likely represent a strategy to shift the squat demands from the knee to the hip.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should target these neuromuscular deficits during rehabilitation and training programs after ACL reconstruction.