Ginekologia polska · 2026
Adaptation to neoplastic disease among women diagnosed with breast cancer and cervical cancer, taking into account the type of surgical procedure and sociodemographic factors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bak Paulina, Ciechacka Maria, Al-Jeabory Mahdi, Ziemianska Joanna K, Ciechacka Daria A, Biber Weronika, Andrascikova Stefania, Kupczak-Wisniowska Boguslawa, Bak Ewelina
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: A diagnosis of breast cancer is considered a highly psychologically distressing event, and coping with the disease constitutes a major challenge. Levels of psychological distress are often very high immediately after diagnosis. Cervical cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the global gynecological reproductive tract system among.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted among 155 females diagnosed with breast cancer and cervical cancer who underwent surgical treatment and took place between January 2024 and December 2025. The diagnostic survey method was employed, along with the following research tool: the Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (Mini-MAC), and self-administered questionnaire.
RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with breast cancer achieved the highest scores in the fighting spirit domain (M = 22.1; SD = 3.0), whereas patients with cervical cancer obtained the highest scores in the anxious preoccupation strategy (M = 20.1; SD = 2.4). The domains of anxious preoccupation, fighting spirit, helplessness-hopelessness, and positive reappraisal, analyzed in relation to the type of total surgical procedure performed in breast cancer were most frequently differentiated by the sociodemographic factor of education level. Other sociodemographic variables influenced only individual coping strategies. The education level of the respondents in breast cancer also significantly affected the constructive and destructive coping styles as defined by the Mini-MAC.
CONCLUSIONS: The Mini-MAC showed that women with breast cancer more often activated a constructive coping style, and the highest scores in this group were observed for positive strategies. In contrast, women with cervical cancer more frequently activated a destructive coping style and negative strategies.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted among 155 females diagnosed with breast cancer and cervical cancer who underwent surgical treatment and took place between January 2024 and December 2025. The diagnostic survey method was employed, along with the following research tool: the Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (Mini-MAC), and self-administered questionnaire.
RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with breast cancer achieved the highest scores in the fighting spirit domain (M = 22.1; SD = 3.0), whereas patients with cervical cancer obtained the highest scores in the anxious preoccupation strategy (M = 20.1; SD = 2.4). The domains of anxious preoccupation, fighting spirit, helplessness-hopelessness, and positive reappraisal, analyzed in relation to the type of total surgical procedure performed in breast cancer were most frequently differentiated by the sociodemographic factor of education level. Other sociodemographic variables influenced only individual coping strategies. The education level of the respondents in breast cancer also significantly affected the constructive and destructive coping styles as defined by the Mini-MAC.
CONCLUSIONS: The Mini-MAC showed that women with breast cancer more often activated a constructive coping style, and the highest scores in this group were observed for positive strategies. In contrast, women with cervical cancer more frequently activated a destructive coping style and negative strategies.