International urogynecology journal · 2025
Efficacy of Two Modes of Transvaginal Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Xiao-Xiao, Xu Ying, Song Yan-Feng, Zheng Xiao-Hua, Jiang Xiao-Xiang, Lin Chao-Qin
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of different modes of transvaginal temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TTCRF) in improving female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
METHODS: A randomized trial with a nested prospective cohort included 89 women with SUI, who were randomized into a unipolar group (n = 35) and a comprehensive group (n = 54). The comprehensive mode group was treated with unipolar and bipolar combination therapy. The 1-h pad test (1-h PWT) was used as the primary metric by which to gauge improvement of SUI. The effective rate was defined as (cure + improvement cases/total cases) × 100%. Daily leakage episodes and urinary incontinence questionnaires were also documented to compliment this metric in assessing treatment efficacy. Patient satisfaction was assessed and adverse reactions were monitored.
RESULTS: No significant difference in the effective rate between the unipolar and comprehensive groups was observed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the end of treatment (62.9% vs 66.7%, 68.6% vs 68.5%, 80.0% vs 71.7%, 74.3% vs 62.5% respectively). Objective improvement of SUI symptoms and subjective satisfaction for all SUI patients were achieved after TTCRF treatment. Ten-course treatment of TTCRF achieved significantly greater treatment effects than five-course treatment as measured by 1-h PWT, daily leakage episodes, International Consultation on Incontinent Questionnaire-Short Form, and Pelvic Organ Prolapsed-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12. No significant side effects occurred in any patients during treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: We consider TTCRF treatment to be a viable outpatient option for SUI, with unipolar and comprehensive modes both showing similar efficacy for SUI.
METHODS: A randomized trial with a nested prospective cohort included 89 women with SUI, who were randomized into a unipolar group (n = 35) and a comprehensive group (n = 54). The comprehensive mode group was treated with unipolar and bipolar combination therapy. The 1-h pad test (1-h PWT) was used as the primary metric by which to gauge improvement of SUI. The effective rate was defined as (cure + improvement cases/total cases) × 100%. Daily leakage episodes and urinary incontinence questionnaires were also documented to compliment this metric in assessing treatment efficacy. Patient satisfaction was assessed and adverse reactions were monitored.
RESULTS: No significant difference in the effective rate between the unipolar and comprehensive groups was observed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the end of treatment (62.9% vs 66.7%, 68.6% vs 68.5%, 80.0% vs 71.7%, 74.3% vs 62.5% respectively). Objective improvement of SUI symptoms and subjective satisfaction for all SUI patients were achieved after TTCRF treatment. Ten-course treatment of TTCRF achieved significantly greater treatment effects than five-course treatment as measured by 1-h PWT, daily leakage episodes, International Consultation on Incontinent Questionnaire-Short Form, and Pelvic Organ Prolapsed-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12. No significant side effects occurred in any patients during treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: We consider TTCRF treatment to be a viable outpatient option for SUI, with unipolar and comprehensive modes both showing similar efficacy for SUI.