European urology · 2004
Pelvicol pubovaginal sling versus tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: a prospective randomized three-year follow-up study.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abdel-Fattah M, Barrington J W, Arunkalaivanan A S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term success rates, complication rates and patient satisfaction rates for Pelvicol pubovaginal sling (Bard) versus TVT (Gynecare) in surgical treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) in women.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized cohort trial.
SETTING: District General Hospital, South West of England.
METHODS: One hundred and forty-two women with urodynamic stress incontinence were randomized to either surgical procedure (Pelvicol = 74, TVT = 68) with median follow-up of 36 month. A postal questionnaire was sent to all women and the response rate was excellent at approximately 90% in both groups.
RESULTS: Cure of incontinence, as identified by a quality of life improvement >90%, and/or patient-determined continent status as dry, were comparable in both groups. When the cure rates were adjusted assuming the non-respondents as failures the figures were almost identical (p > 0.05). Preoperative continence pad usage was similar for both groups. Overall, a postoperative significant decrease in pad score was noted in both groups (p = 0.01) but there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Statistical analysis failed to detect significant differences between both groups as regards complication rates such as frequency, nocturia, de-novo urgency or dyspareunia.
CONCLUSION: Pelvicol sling is a safe procedure in the surgical management of USI with similar success rate and patient satisfaction rate to TVT up to three years of follow-up.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized cohort trial.
SETTING: District General Hospital, South West of England.
METHODS: One hundred and forty-two women with urodynamic stress incontinence were randomized to either surgical procedure (Pelvicol = 74, TVT = 68) with median follow-up of 36 month. A postal questionnaire was sent to all women and the response rate was excellent at approximately 90% in both groups.
RESULTS: Cure of incontinence, as identified by a quality of life improvement >90%, and/or patient-determined continent status as dry, were comparable in both groups. When the cure rates were adjusted assuming the non-respondents as failures the figures were almost identical (p > 0.05). Preoperative continence pad usage was similar for both groups. Overall, a postoperative significant decrease in pad score was noted in both groups (p = 0.01) but there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Statistical analysis failed to detect significant differences between both groups as regards complication rates such as frequency, nocturia, de-novo urgency or dyspareunia.
CONCLUSION: Pelvicol sling is a safe procedure in the surgical management of USI with similar success rate and patient satisfaction rate to TVT up to three years of follow-up.