Endoscopy · 2025
Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding following cold snare polypectomy of lesions <10 mm in patients on high-dose antithrombotic therapy: insights from a Dutch colonoscopy cohort.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Bokhorst Querijn N E, Te Marvelde Sophie, Borkent Jos W, Fockens Paul, Dekker Evelien, van der Vlugt Manon
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines state that low-risk polypectomies (cold snare polypectomies of lesions <10 mm) can be safely performed with continuation of single antiplatelet therapy (low-dose antithrombotic therapy [ATT]). The safety of low-risk polypectomies with continuation of an anticoagulant or dual antiplatelet therapy (high-dose ATT) is uncertain.
METHODS: Data from 31 325 colonoscopies performed at two Dutch endoscopy centers were analyzed. The centers followed different protocols for the management of ATT around colonoscopies. Incidence of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) and thromboembolic events with continuation or discontinuation of different ATTs around colonoscopy were analyzed.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of DPPB for colonoscopies with only low-risk polypectomies was 11/12 291 (0.09%). The incidence of DPPB was similar for patients continuing either high- or low-dose ATT (0.58% vs. 0.30%; P = 0.61). Although the incidence of DPPB significantly differed between patients on continued high-dose and no ATT (0.58% vs. 0.07%; P = 0.04), the absolute risk difference was small (0.67%) and the number of patients required to discontinue high-dose ATT to prevent one case of DPPB was estimated at 150. The severity of DPPBs was comparable between all groups. The incidence of thromboembolic events with ATT discontinuation was 2/1098 (0.18%).
CONCLUSION: The risk of DPPB after low-risk polypectomies was similar for patients who continued high- and low-dose ATT. Although higher compared with patients without ATT, the incidence of DPPB with continued high-dose ATT remains very low. Therefore, we suggest continuation of high-dose ATT for colonoscopy indications with a low risk of detecting advanced polyps.
METHODS: Data from 31 325 colonoscopies performed at two Dutch endoscopy centers were analyzed. The centers followed different protocols for the management of ATT around colonoscopies. Incidence of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) and thromboembolic events with continuation or discontinuation of different ATTs around colonoscopy were analyzed.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of DPPB for colonoscopies with only low-risk polypectomies was 11/12 291 (0.09%). The incidence of DPPB was similar for patients continuing either high- or low-dose ATT (0.58% vs. 0.30%; P = 0.61). Although the incidence of DPPB significantly differed between patients on continued high-dose and no ATT (0.58% vs. 0.07%; P = 0.04), the absolute risk difference was small (0.67%) and the number of patients required to discontinue high-dose ATT to prevent one case of DPPB was estimated at 150. The severity of DPPBs was comparable between all groups. The incidence of thromboembolic events with ATT discontinuation was 2/1098 (0.18%).
CONCLUSION: The risk of DPPB after low-risk polypectomies was similar for patients who continued high- and low-dose ATT. Although higher compared with patients without ATT, the incidence of DPPB with continued high-dose ATT remains very low. Therefore, we suggest continuation of high-dose ATT for colonoscopy indications with a low risk of detecting advanced polyps.