The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists · 2003
Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in managing hemodynamically stable patients with ruptured corpus luteum with hemoperitoneum.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Teng Sen-Wen, Tseng Jen-Yu, Chang Cheng-Kun, Li Chung-Ti, Chen Yi-Jen, Wang Peng-Hui
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare differences between laparoscopy and laparotomy in managing women ruptured corpus luteum with hemoperitoneum.
DESIGN: Three-year, prospective, nonrandomized study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: University-affiliated regional hospital.
PATIENTS: Sixty hemodynamically stable women.
INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic surgery (30 women) and laparotomy (30).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Laparoscopic surgery had significant advantages over laparotomy, including shorter hospital stay (55.33 +/- 7.67 vs 97.77 +/- 14.45 hrs, p < 0.001) without increased adverse events. Laparoscopic surgery also showed trends of shorter operating time, improved wound care, and less postoperative pain.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy surgery for diagnosis and treatment of women with ruptured hemorrhagic corpus luteum appears superior to laparotomy. We suggest that surgeons try laparoscopy first as a diagnostic and probably therapeutic procedure.
DESIGN: Three-year, prospective, nonrandomized study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: University-affiliated regional hospital.
PATIENTS: Sixty hemodynamically stable women.
INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic surgery (30 women) and laparotomy (30).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Laparoscopic surgery had significant advantages over laparotomy, including shorter hospital stay (55.33 +/- 7.67 vs 97.77 +/- 14.45 hrs, p < 0.001) without increased adverse events. Laparoscopic surgery also showed trends of shorter operating time, improved wound care, and less postoperative pain.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy surgery for diagnosis and treatment of women with ruptured hemorrhagic corpus luteum appears superior to laparotomy. We suggest that surgeons try laparoscopy first as a diagnostic and probably therapeutic procedure.