MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.11607/jomi.6732

Медицинская библиотека · The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants · 2018

Comparative study of immediate loading on short dental implants and conventional dental implants in the posterior mandible: A randomized clinical trial.

Weerapong Kritsada, Sirimongkolwattana Siripong, Sastraruji Thanapat, Khongkhunthian Pathawee

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Immediate dental implant loading has been investigated with favorable results. However, short implants have not been investigated in this treatment option. This study compared the clinical outcomes and survival rates of immediately loaded short and conventional length dental implants in replacing mandibular molar teeth.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Forty-six implants (23 short dental implants and 23 conventional dental implants) in 46 patients were included in the study. Provisional computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic crowns were cemented to the abutments and immediately loaded. Several clinical parameters were recorded and statistically analyzed at 4-month- and 1-year-follow-up.

RESULTS

Two short implants lost integration, and one conventional implant failed. No statistically significant difference between the two implant types was found (P = 1.00). Minor complications were recorded; three provisional crown fractures were found in the short implant group and two provisional crown fractures in the conventional implant group. There was no significant difference in implant stability quotient values for short or conventional implants between baseline (short: 73.86 ± 2.38, conventional: 75.05 ± 3.26, P = .088), 4 months after loading (short: 72.37 ± 1.35, conventional: 72.89 ± 1.87, P = .165), and 1 year after loading (short: 74.60 ± 2.03, conventional: 75.35 ± 2.66, P = .296). The mean marginal bone level loss 4 months after loading was 0.28 ± 0.29 mm for short implants and 0.25 ± 0.25 mm for conventional implants (P = .73), and at 1 year after loading was 0.33 ± 0.47 mm for short implants and 0.26 ± 0.27 mm for conventional implants (P = .554); there was no statistical difference between the two implant types.

CONCLUSION

The immediate loading of short implants is comparable to conventional length implants in terms of implant survival, marginal bone level change, and implant stability quotient value.

Для цитирования: Weerapong Kritsada, Sirimongkolwattana Siripong, Sastraruji Thanapat, Khongkhunthian Pathawee. Comparative study of immediate loading on short dental implants and conventional dental implants in the posterior mandible: A randomized clinical trial.. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2018. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6732.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.