MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/upj.0000000000000792

Медицинская библиотека · Urology practice · 2025

Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions in Reconstructive Urology.

Alshak Mark N, Cecelic Johanna, Florissi Isabella, Alam Ridwan, Cohen Andrew J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Artificial intelligence (such as Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer [ChatGPT]) augments patient education on medical topics, including reconstructive surgery. In this study, we assess the information, misinformation, and readability of ChatGPT responses to reconstructive urology questions. We also evaluate prompt engineering to optimize responses.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-five questions were presented to ChatGPT (version 4 omni [ChatGPT-4o], OpenAI) and were divided into 6 domains: stress urinary continence, neurogenic bladder, urethral stricture, ureteral stricture, impotence, and Peyronie disease. Quality of health information was assessed using DISCERN (1 [low] to 5 [high]). Understandability and actionability were assessed using Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P; 0% [low] to 100% [high]). Misinformation was scored from 1 (no misinformation) to 5 (high misinformation). Grade and reading level were calculated using the Flesch-Kincaid scale (5 [easy] to 16 [difficult] and 100-90 [fifth grade level] to 10-0 [professional level], respectively).

RESULTS

Mean and median DISCERN scores were 3.63 and 5. PEMAT-P understandability was 85.3% but only 37.2% on actionability. There was little misinformation (mean, range: 1.23, 1-4). Responses were at a college graduate reading level. Using prompt engineering in the incontinence domain, scores for DISCERN (3.57-4.75, P = .007), PEMAT-P understandability (89.6% to 96.2%, P < .001), actionability (38.3% to 93.5%, P < .001), and reading level (grade 12.4-5.4, P < .01) all improved significantly while misinformation and word count did not change significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT-4o's responses are of high quality and understandability with little misinformation. Limitations include actionability and advanced reading level. Using prompt engineering, these deficiencies were addressed without increasing misinformation. ChatGPT-4o can help augment reconstructive urology.

Для цитирования: Alshak Mark N, Cecelic Johanna, Florissi Isabella, Alam Ridwan, Cohen Andrew J. Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions in Reconstructive Urology.. Urology practice. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000792.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.