American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2016
Dichorionic twin trajectories: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Grantz Katherine L, Grewal Jagteshwar, Albert Paul S, Wapner Ronald, D'Alton Mary E, Sciscione Anthony, Grobman William A, Wing Deborah A, Owen John, Newman Roger B, Chien Edward K, Gore-Langton Robert E, Kim Sungduk, Zhang Cuilin, Buck Louis Germaine M, Hediger Mary L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Systematic evaluation and estimation of growth trajectories in twins require ultrasound measurements across gestation that are performed in controlled clinical settings. Currently, there are few such data for contemporary populations. There is also controversy about whether twin fetal growth should be evaluated with the use of the same benchmarks as singleton growth.
OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to define the trajectory of fetal growth in dichorionic twins empirically using longitudinal 2-dimensional ultrasonography and to compare the fetal growth trajectories for dichorionic twins with those based on a growth standard that was developed by our group for singletons.
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort of 171 women with twin gestations was recruited from 8 US sites from 2012-2013. After an initial sonogram at 11 weeks 0 days-13 weeks 6 days of gestation during which dichorionicity was confirmed, women were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 serial ultrasonography schedules. Growth curves and percentiles were estimated with the use of linear mixed models with cubic splines. Percentiles were compared statistically at each gestational week between the twins and 1731 singletons, after adjustment for maternal age, race/ethnicity, height, weight, parity, employment, marital status, insurance, income, education, and infant sex. Linear mixed models were used to test for overall differences between the twin and singleton trajectories with the use of likelihood ratio tests of interaction terms between spline mean structure terms and twin-singleton indicator variables. Singleton standards were weighted to correspond to the distribution of maternal race in twins. For those ultrasound measurements in which there were significant global tests for differences between twins and singletons, we tested for week-specific differences using Wald tests that were computed at each gestational age. In a separate analysis, we evaluated the degree of reclassification in small for gestational age, which was defined as <10th percentile that would be introduced if fetal growth estimation for twins was based on an unweighted singleton standard.
RESULTS: Women underwent a median of 5 ultrasound scans. The 50th percentile abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight trajectories of twin fetuses diverged significantly beginning at 32 weeks of gestation; biparietal diameter in twins was smaller from 34-36 weeks of gestation. There were no differences in head circumference or femur length. The mean head circumference/abdominal circumference ratio was progressively larger for twins compared with singletons beginning at 33 weeks of gestation, which indicated a comparatively asymmetric growth pattern. At 35 weeks of gestation, the average gestational age at delivery for twins, the estimated fetal weights for the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles were 1960, 2376, and 2879 g for dichorionic twins, respectively, and 2180, 2567, and 3022 g for the singletons, respectively. At 32 weeks of gestation, the initial week when the mean estimated fetal weight for twins was smaller than that of singletons, 34% of twins would be classified as small for gestational age with the use of a singleton, non-Hispanic white standard. By 35 weeks of gestation, 38% of twins would be classified as small for gestational age.
CONCLUSION: The comparatively asymmetric growth pattern in twin gestations, initially evident at 32 weeks of gestation, is consistent with the concept that the intrauterine environment becomes constrained in its ability to sustain growth in twin fetuses. Near term, nearly 40% of twins would be classified as small for gestational age based on a singleton growth standard.
OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to define the trajectory of fetal growth in dichorionic twins empirically using longitudinal 2-dimensional ultrasonography and to compare the fetal growth trajectories for dichorionic twins with those based on a growth standard that was developed by our group for singletons.
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort of 171 women with twin gestations was recruited from 8 US sites from 2012-2013. After an initial sonogram at 11 weeks 0 days-13 weeks 6 days of gestation during which dichorionicity was confirmed, women were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 serial ultrasonography schedules. Growth curves and percentiles were estimated with the use of linear mixed models with cubic splines. Percentiles were compared statistically at each gestational week between the twins and 1731 singletons, after adjustment for maternal age, race/ethnicity, height, weight, parity, employment, marital status, insurance, income, education, and infant sex. Linear mixed models were used to test for overall differences between the twin and singleton trajectories with the use of likelihood ratio tests of interaction terms between spline mean structure terms and twin-singleton indicator variables. Singleton standards were weighted to correspond to the distribution of maternal race in twins. For those ultrasound measurements in which there were significant global tests for differences between twins and singletons, we tested for week-specific differences using Wald tests that were computed at each gestational age. In a separate analysis, we evaluated the degree of reclassification in small for gestational age, which was defined as <10th percentile that would be introduced if fetal growth estimation for twins was based on an unweighted singleton standard.
RESULTS: Women underwent a median of 5 ultrasound scans. The 50th percentile abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight trajectories of twin fetuses diverged significantly beginning at 32 weeks of gestation; biparietal diameter in twins was smaller from 34-36 weeks of gestation. There were no differences in head circumference or femur length. The mean head circumference/abdominal circumference ratio was progressively larger for twins compared with singletons beginning at 33 weeks of gestation, which indicated a comparatively asymmetric growth pattern. At 35 weeks of gestation, the average gestational age at delivery for twins, the estimated fetal weights for the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles were 1960, 2376, and 2879 g for dichorionic twins, respectively, and 2180, 2567, and 3022 g for the singletons, respectively. At 32 weeks of gestation, the initial week when the mean estimated fetal weight for twins was smaller than that of singletons, 34% of twins would be classified as small for gestational age with the use of a singleton, non-Hispanic white standard. By 35 weeks of gestation, 38% of twins would be classified as small for gestational age.
CONCLUSION: The comparatively asymmetric growth pattern in twin gestations, initially evident at 32 weeks of gestation, is consistent with the concept that the intrauterine environment becomes constrained in its ability to sustain growth in twin fetuses. Near term, nearly 40% of twins would be classified as small for gestational age based on a singleton growth standard.