Developmental neurorehabilitation · 2012
Agreement between parent-adolescent ratings on psychosocial outcome and quality-of-life following childhood traumatic brain injury.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Green Laura, Godfrey Celia, Soo Chery, Anderson Vicki, Catroppa Cathy
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated parent-adolescent agreement in long-term psychosocial and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes. The sample comprised adolescents aged 15-18 years, who sustained childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) between birth and 5 years of age.
METHODS: Thirty-three participants (17 adolescents with TBI and 16 TBI parent-proxies) were involved in the study which compared parent and adolescent ratings on the Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale-Child form (SPRS-C) and the Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory (PedsQL). The questionnaires were administered through phone interviews.
RESULTS: As hypothesized, parent-adolescent agreement was acceptable for psychosocial outcome (intra-class coefficient [ICC] of 0.844, p < 0.001), whereas discrepancies were found for ratings of QoL (ICC of 0.506, p = 0.092).
CONCLUSION: The finding that parents and adolescents agree on psychosocial outcome is promising for those instances when the patient is unable to report; however, discrepancies regarding QoL suggest caution needs to be taken when interpreting parent-rated QoL data.
METHODS: Thirty-three participants (17 adolescents with TBI and 16 TBI parent-proxies) were involved in the study which compared parent and adolescent ratings on the Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale-Child form (SPRS-C) and the Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory (PedsQL). The questionnaires were administered through phone interviews.
RESULTS: As hypothesized, parent-adolescent agreement was acceptable for psychosocial outcome (intra-class coefficient [ICC] of 0.844, p < 0.001), whereas discrepancies were found for ratings of QoL (ICC of 0.506, p = 0.092).
CONCLUSION: The finding that parents and adolescents agree on psychosocial outcome is promising for those instances when the patient is unable to report; however, discrepancies regarding QoL suggest caution needs to be taken when interpreting parent-rated QoL data.