MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00464.x

Медицинская библиотека · Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2008

Issues and challenges of involving users in medical device development.

Bridgelal Ram Mala, Grocott Patricia R, Weir Heather C M

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

User engagement has become a central tenet of health-care policy. This paper reports on a case study in progress that highlights user engagement in the research process in relation to medical device development.

OBJECTIVES

To work with a specific group of medical device users to uncover unmet needs, translating these into design concepts, novel technologies and products. To validate a knowledge transfer model that may be replicated for a range of medical device applications and user groups.

METHODS

In depth qualitative case study to elicit and analyse user needs. The focus is on identifying design concepts for medical device applications from unmet needs, and validating these in an iterative feedback loop to the users.

RESULTS

The case study has highlighted three interrelated challenges: ensuring unmet needs drive new design concepts and technology development; managing user expectations and managing the research process.

CONCLUSION

Despite the challenges, active participation of users is crucial to developing usable and clinically effective devices.

Для цитирования: Bridgelal Ram Mala, Grocott Patricia R, Weir Heather C M. Issues and challenges of involving users in medical device development.. Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy. 2008. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00464.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.