JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
Determining factors for dexmedetomidine sedation in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early-stage gastric cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yoshida Erika, Yamamoto Yorimasa, Tohata Misako, Gomi Kuniyo, Okayasu Tadashi, Nagahama Masatsugu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although no specific sedation recommendations exist in early-stage gastric cancer (ESGC) for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), dexmedetomidine (DEX) is useful along with benzodiazepines and analgesics. Furthermore, DEX is used for endoscopic treatment requiring lengthy sedation. However, it is unclear which patients should be administered DEX. We examined the factors that determine when DEX should be added for sedation during ESD for ESGC.
METHODS: Of 316 patients undergoing ESD for ESGC at our hospital between January 2017 and December 2020, we examined 310 receiving intravenous anesthesia. Preoperative patient factors and treatment outcomes were retrospectively examined according to the sedation method.
RESULTS: Among patients with ESGC undergoing ESD at our hospital, DEX was more frequently used alongside sedation in men, those undergoing gastrectomy, those with a lesion diameter ≥20 mm, and those with preoperative ulcers. In the standard group, patients whose treatment duration exceeded 120 min typically had a lesion diameter ≥20 mm, preoperative ulcers, lesions located outside the L region, and were treated by junior physicians.
CONCLUSION: It is important to evaluate specific preoperative factors (lesion diameter ≥20 mm, preoperative ulcers, lesion located outside the L region, and having a junior physician as the treating physician) in patients undergoing ESD for ESGC to determine whether the combined use of DEX in sedation is necessary.
METHODS: Of 316 patients undergoing ESD for ESGC at our hospital between January 2017 and December 2020, we examined 310 receiving intravenous anesthesia. Preoperative patient factors and treatment outcomes were retrospectively examined according to the sedation method.
RESULTS: Among patients with ESGC undergoing ESD at our hospital, DEX was more frequently used alongside sedation in men, those undergoing gastrectomy, those with a lesion diameter ≥20 mm, and those with preoperative ulcers. In the standard group, patients whose treatment duration exceeded 120 min typically had a lesion diameter ≥20 mm, preoperative ulcers, lesions located outside the L region, and were treated by junior physicians.
CONCLUSION: It is important to evaluate specific preoperative factors (lesion diameter ≥20 mm, preoperative ulcers, lesion located outside the L region, and having a junior physician as the treating physician) in patients undergoing ESD for ESGC to determine whether the combined use of DEX in sedation is necessary.