The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2022
An Algorithmic Approach for Deploying Buccal Fat Pad Flaps and Buccal Myomucosal Flaps Strategically in Primary and Secondary Palatoplasty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Qamar Fatima, McLaughlin Mariel M, Lee Matthew, Pringle Aleshia J, Halsey Jordan, Rottgers S Alex
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Recent publications have introduced the use of buccal myomucosal and fat pad flaps to augment palatal repairs with autologous tissue. We propose a workflow for intraoperative decision-making to introduce these adjuncts into standard palatoplasty procedures.
DESIGN/PATIENTS: A retrospective chart review of a single-surgeon series of patients undergoing primary and secondary palatoplasties performed between October 2017 and November 2020 was completed after Institutional Review Board approval.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, phenotype, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included in a review. For those undergoing primary repair, 23.3% underwent a Furlow palatoplasty alone, 46.3% had a Furlow palatoplasty accompanied with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and/or a buccal fat flap (BFF). A unilateral buccal myomucosal flap (BMMF) with or without augmentation with BFF or ADM was employed in 16.3% of the cases. Fourteen percent required a bilateral BMMF+/- ADM. Fistula occurrence was 2.3% (n = 1). For revisions, 27% underwent only a conversion Furlow palatoplasty, 26% had a conversion Furlow palatoplasty accompanied with ADM and/or a BFF, 33% had a unilateral BMMF or BMMF/ADM, and 14% required a bilateral BMMF+/- ADM.
CONCLUSIONS: In severe phenotypes or complicated cases, buccal fat flaps and myomucosal flaps may be utilized. This approach has mostly replaced the use of ADM over time. An algorithmic approach to palatoplasty allows surgeons to tailor the extent of surgery to the needs of each patient.
DESIGN/PATIENTS: A retrospective chart review of a single-surgeon series of patients undergoing primary and secondary palatoplasties performed between October 2017 and November 2020 was completed after Institutional Review Board approval.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, phenotype, operative details, and postoperative complications were recorded.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included in a review. For those undergoing primary repair, 23.3% underwent a Furlow palatoplasty alone, 46.3% had a Furlow palatoplasty accompanied with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and/or a buccal fat flap (BFF). A unilateral buccal myomucosal flap (BMMF) with or without augmentation with BFF or ADM was employed in 16.3% of the cases. Fourteen percent required a bilateral BMMF+/- ADM. Fistula occurrence was 2.3% (n = 1). For revisions, 27% underwent only a conversion Furlow palatoplasty, 26% had a conversion Furlow palatoplasty accompanied with ADM and/or a BFF, 33% had a unilateral BMMF or BMMF/ADM, and 14% required a bilateral BMMF+/- ADM.
CONCLUSIONS: In severe phenotypes or complicated cases, buccal fat flaps and myomucosal flaps may be utilized. This approach has mostly replaced the use of ADM over time. An algorithmic approach to palatoplasty allows surgeons to tailor the extent of surgery to the needs of each patient.