Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research · 2020
Laparoscopy-Assisted Versus Open Surgery in Treating Intestinal Atresia: Single Center Experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lima Mario, Di Salvo Neil, Cordola Chiara, D'Antonio Simone, Libri Michele, Maffi Michela, Gargano Tommaso, Ruggeri Giovanni, Catania Vincenzo Davide
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Surgical management of jejuno-ileal atresia/stenosis (JIA) is shifting to a minimally invasive approach. Our purpose is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted surgery (LAS) in JIA by comparing outcomes with a control group of open surgery (OS).
METHODS: A retrospective review of JIA cases was performed. Demographic, surgical, and outcomes data were extracted. LAS cases were compared with OS. Fisher's exact-test for qualitative and Mann-Whitney-test for quantitative values were used. p values <0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (24/23, F/M) were included. In 19 (40%), the LAS technique was successfully performed, while 3 (17%) required conversion to OS. No differences were observed between the LAS and OS (n = 28) groups concerning demographic data (sex, mean gestational age, mean weight, associated anomalies) and type of JIA. Operative time was shorter in LAS (112 ± 46 min) compared to OS (138 ± 40 min), p = 0.04. Time to start enteral feeding and time to full enteral was shorter in LAS compared to OS, p = 0.04. No difference was observed between the two groups concerning duration of parenteral nutrition, length of hospitalization and weight at discharge. Overall rate of postoperative complications was 14% (n = 7), with a slightly prevalence in OS (18%) compared to LAS (10%), p = 0.68.
CONCLUSIONS: The LAS technique in the treatment of neonatal JIA is safe and feasible. LAS is associated with shorter operative and restoration of enteral feeding times. The post-operative outcomes in LAS are similar with OS, with a lower rate of postoperative complications.
METHODS: A retrospective review of JIA cases was performed. Demographic, surgical, and outcomes data were extracted. LAS cases were compared with OS. Fisher's exact-test for qualitative and Mann-Whitney-test for quantitative values were used. p values <0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (24/23, F/M) were included. In 19 (40%), the LAS technique was successfully performed, while 3 (17%) required conversion to OS. No differences were observed between the LAS and OS (n = 28) groups concerning demographic data (sex, mean gestational age, mean weight, associated anomalies) and type of JIA. Operative time was shorter in LAS (112 ± 46 min) compared to OS (138 ± 40 min), p = 0.04. Time to start enteral feeding and time to full enteral was shorter in LAS compared to OS, p = 0.04. No difference was observed between the two groups concerning duration of parenteral nutrition, length of hospitalization and weight at discharge. Overall rate of postoperative complications was 14% (n = 7), with a slightly prevalence in OS (18%) compared to LAS (10%), p = 0.68.
CONCLUSIONS: The LAS technique in the treatment of neonatal JIA is safe and feasible. LAS is associated with shorter operative and restoration of enteral feeding times. The post-operative outcomes in LAS are similar with OS, with a lower rate of postoperative complications.