Digital health · 2025
Machine learning models for estimating fetal weight based on ultrasonographic biometry: Development and validation study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Espinola-Sánchez Marcos, Limay-Rios Antonio, Campaña-Acuña Andrés, Sanca-Valeriano Silvia
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Advances in machine learning (ML) offer an innovative approach to accurate fetal weight estimation by integrating multiple biometric and clinical variables.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate ML models for estimating fetal weight using biometric data obtained via ultrasonography, evaluating their accuracy and comparing them with traditional formulas, such as Hadlock and Shepard.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the National Maternal Perinatal Institute of Peru from 2009 to 2022, including 3525 low-risk pregnancies with singleton gestations. ML models, including Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest and TabPFN (Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network), were trained and validated using ultrasonographic measurements such as biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, head circumference, femur length, and gestational age. Accuracy was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R²) and mean squared error (MSE), comparing the ML models to the Hadlock and Shepard formulas.
RESULTS: Data from the first study stage (2009-2018) indicated that the TabPFN model was the most accurate (R² = 0.856; MSE = 0.146), outperforming the Hadlock (R² = 0.807; MSE = 0.195) and Shepard (R² = 0.801; MSE = 0.201) formulas. In the independent validation sample (2019-2022), TabPFN consistently outperformed other methods (R² = 0.873; MSE = 0.144). Model consistency was evaluated through cross-validation and randomization of samples.
CONCLUSIONS: The TabPFN model outperformed traditional formulas, including Hadlock and Shepard, and other evaluated machine learning methods in estimating fetal weight. Its high predictive accuracy, robustness across temporally distinct cohorts, and independence from hyperparameter tuning support its potential as a reliable clinical decision-support tool in obstetric care.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate ML models for estimating fetal weight using biometric data obtained via ultrasonography, evaluating their accuracy and comparing them with traditional formulas, such as Hadlock and Shepard.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the National Maternal Perinatal Institute of Peru from 2009 to 2022, including 3525 low-risk pregnancies with singleton gestations. ML models, including Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest and TabPFN (Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network), were trained and validated using ultrasonographic measurements such as biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, head circumference, femur length, and gestational age. Accuracy was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R²) and mean squared error (MSE), comparing the ML models to the Hadlock and Shepard formulas.
RESULTS: Data from the first study stage (2009-2018) indicated that the TabPFN model was the most accurate (R² = 0.856; MSE = 0.146), outperforming the Hadlock (R² = 0.807; MSE = 0.195) and Shepard (R² = 0.801; MSE = 0.201) formulas. In the independent validation sample (2019-2022), TabPFN consistently outperformed other methods (R² = 0.873; MSE = 0.144). Model consistency was evaluated through cross-validation and randomization of samples.
CONCLUSIONS: The TabPFN model outperformed traditional formulas, including Hadlock and Shepard, and other evaluated machine learning methods in estimating fetal weight. Its high predictive accuracy, robustness across temporally distinct cohorts, and independence from hyperparameter tuning support its potential as a reliable clinical decision-support tool in obstetric care.