Internal and emergency medicine · 2026
Association between electronic cigarette use and prediabetes, diabetes, and insulin resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Adebisi Yusuff Adebayo, Campagna Davide, Ceriello Antonio, Alhur Anas Ali, Alshahrani Najim Z, Misra Anoop, Basit Abdul, Russo Cristina, Battelino Tadej, Somasundaram Noel, Jalaludin Muhammad Yazid, Saisho Yoshifumi, Walicka Magdalena, Tomaselli Venera, Magliano Dianna J, Moser Othmar, Mitri Joanna, Chen Roger, Polosa Riccardo
Аннотация
Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use has grown rapidly worldwide, yet metabolic health consequences, particularly glycaemic outcomes, remain poorly understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesises the available epidemiological evidence on the association between e-cigarette use and diabetes mellitus, prediabetes, and insulin resistance. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Embase from inception through December 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting effect estimates for the association between e-cigarette use and diabetes, prediabetes, or insulin resistance in adult populations were eligible. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed, stratified by outcome and exposure category (current exclusive e-cigarette users, dual users, and former e-cigarette users versus never users). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics and Cochran's Q test. Ten studies (9 cross-sectional, 1 prospective cohort; combined participants exceeding 2.8 million) met inclusion criteria; 8 cross-sectional studies contributed to quantitative pooling, while one cross-sectional study and the prospective cohort were narratively synthesised. For prediabetes, pooled ORs versus never users were 1.34 (95% CI 1.01-1.77; I2 = 74.2%) for current exclusive users, 1.26 (1.06-1.49; I2 = 75.4%) for dual users, and 1.13 (1.06-1.20; I2 = 0%) for former users. For diabetes, only dual users showed a significant elevation (OR 1.23; 1.01-1.49; I2 = 77.4%); current exclusive (OR 1.04; 0.93-1.16; I2 = 45.1%) and former users (OR 1.11; 0.80-1.54; I2 = 31.6%) did not differ from never users. For insulin resistance, current exclusive e-cigarette users versus never users had an OR of 1.37 (95% CI 1.06-1.77; I2 = 0%). The sole prospective cohort study found no significant association between exclusive e-cigarette use and incident type 2 diabetes (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.66-1.16). Neither cross-sectional nor prospective evidence linked exclusive e-cigarette use to diabetes; significant associations were confined to dual users. Elevated odds of prediabetes and insulin resistance among exclusive users were observed cross-sectionally but cannot support causal claims. Large prospective studies with longer follow-up, objective verification of product exposure status (for example, biomarkers distinguishing exclusive vaping from combustible tobacco use), and standardised laboratory-based glycaemic endpoints are needed.