The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2017
Efficacy and tolerability of treatment with mirabegron compared with solifenacin in the management of overactive bladder syndrome: A retrospective analysis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schiavi Michele C, Faiano Pierangelo, D'Oria Ottavia, Zullo Marzio A, Muzii Ludovico, Benedetti Panici Pierluigi
Аннотация
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin and mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome.
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis in 342 women affected by OAB syndrome; 168 were treated with solifenacin 5 mg/daily and 174 with mirabegron 50 mg/daily. A clinical evaluation, 3-day voiding diary, and urodynamic testing was performed. Patients completed the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire - Short Form, the King's Health Questionnaire, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire. The adverse effects were evaluated. The two groups were compared at baseline and at 12 weeks.
RESULTS: After 12 weeks, a significant reduction in the mean number/24 h of voids and urgent micturition episodes/24 h was observed in both groups. Detrusor overactivity decreased from 58.3% to 13.1% in the solifenacin group and from 58% to 11% in the mirabegron group. Twenty (12%) and 18 (10.7%) patients taking solifenacin reported constipation and dry mouth, respectively, versus four (2.3%) and five (2.9%) patients taking mirabegron, respectively, but there was no difference between the groups in the change in vital signs. The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire - Short Form and King's Health Questionnaire scores did not demonstrate significant differences and the abandonment rates in the solifenacin and mirabegron groups were 25.5% and 20%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Solifenacin and mirabegron showed the same efficacy in the treatment of OAB but solifenacin had more adverse effects.
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis in 342 women affected by OAB syndrome; 168 were treated with solifenacin 5 mg/daily and 174 with mirabegron 50 mg/daily. A clinical evaluation, 3-day voiding diary, and urodynamic testing was performed. Patients completed the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire - Short Form, the King's Health Questionnaire, and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire. The adverse effects were evaluated. The two groups were compared at baseline and at 12 weeks.
RESULTS: After 12 weeks, a significant reduction in the mean number/24 h of voids and urgent micturition episodes/24 h was observed in both groups. Detrusor overactivity decreased from 58.3% to 13.1% in the solifenacin group and from 58% to 11% in the mirabegron group. Twenty (12%) and 18 (10.7%) patients taking solifenacin reported constipation and dry mouth, respectively, versus four (2.3%) and five (2.9%) patients taking mirabegron, respectively, but there was no difference between the groups in the change in vital signs. The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire - Short Form and King's Health Questionnaire scores did not demonstrate significant differences and the abandonment rates in the solifenacin and mirabegron groups were 25.5% and 20%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Solifenacin and mirabegron showed the same efficacy in the treatment of OAB but solifenacin had more adverse effects.