MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jalm/jfaf062

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of applied laboratory medicine · 2025

Fetal Fraction Methodologies and Their Clinical Use: Results of a College of American Pathologists Exercise.

Palomaki Glenn E, Wyatt Philip, Rowsey Ross A, Cacheris Phillip Michael, Lepage Nathalie, Natowicz Marvin R, Long Thomas, Moyer Ann M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive prenatal screening for common autosomal trisomies, sex chromosome aneuploidies and microdeletions vary by methodology and laboratory practice. The fetal portion of all cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation defines the fetal fraction (FF). The minimum specimen FF levels for reporting results vary between laboratories as well as the screening target (e.g., common trisomies vs select microdeletions). This variability can lead to confusion for both healthcare providers and patients.

METHODS

Participants in the College of American Pathologists Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing 2021-B Exercise provided FF estimates for 3 manufactured samples. Responses to supplemental questions were also collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 72 of 77 participants responded. FF was measured by 66 participants using sequence counts (40), single nucleotide polymorphisms (15), fragment length (24), and Y chromosome sequences (24). Nearly half (48%) used multiple methods. For common trisomies, minimum FFs were none or <1% (n = 7), 1.0% to 3.9% (n = 35), 4.0% to 6.9% (n = 23), and ≥7.0% (n = 1); 4 participants did not measure FF. Challenge-specific FFs were variable with CVs of 13%, 15%, and 36%; the latter rate appears due to that sample's fetal karyotype of 47,XYY. Comparing adjusted FF results for the 3 samples shows that 85% of participant results were within 20% of the consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Using multiple methods to estimate FF was common, and cutoff levels for sample suitability varied widely. Within-laboratory FFs were less variable than between laboratories. Current FF estimates from clinical laboratories are not standardized and should be considered laboratory-specific.

Для цитирования: Palomaki Glenn E, Wyatt Philip, Rowsey Ross A, Cacheris Phillip Michael, Lepage Nathalie, Natowicz Marvin R, Long Thomas, Moyer Ann M. Fetal Fraction Methodologies and Their Clinical Use: Results of a College of American Pathologists Exercise.. The journal of applied laboratory medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfaf062.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.