T2* Mapping of Peroneal Tendons Using Clinically Relevant Subregions in an Asymptomatic Population.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Peroneal tendon evaluation is particularly demanding using current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques because of their curving path around the lateral malleolus. Quantifiable, objective data on the health of the peroneal tendons could be useful for improving diagnosis of tendon pathology and tracking post-treatment responses. The purpose of this study was to establish a method and normative T2-star (T2*) values for the peroneal tendons in a screened asymptomatic cohort using clinically reproducible subregions, providing a baseline for comparison with peroneal tendon pathology.
METHODS
Unilateral ankle scans were acquired for 26 asymptomatic volunteers with a 3-Tesla MRI system using a T2* mapping sequence in the axial and sagittal planes. The peroneus brevis and peroneus longus tendons were manually segmented and subregions were isolated in the proximity of the lateral malleolus. Summary statistics for T2* values were calculated.
RESULTS
The peroneus brevis tendon exhibited a mean T2* value of 12 ms and the peroneus longus tendon was 11 ms. Subregions distal to the lateral malleolus had significantly higher T2* values ( P < .05) than the subregions proximal in both tendons, in both the axial and sagittal planes.
CONCLUSION
Peroneal tendon regions distal to the inferior tip of the lateral malleolus had significantly higher T2* values than those regions proximal, which could be related to anatomical differences along the tendon.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides a quantitative method and normative baseline T2* mapping values for comparison with symptomatic clinically compromised peroneal tendon patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.