Use of Primary Prophylaxis with G-CSF in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Intensive Chemotherapy Does Not Affect Quality of Response.
Аннотация
Background/
Objectives
The objective of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as primary prophylaxis in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing intensive chemotherapy.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 112 AML patients treated with intensive chemotherapy at Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata in Rome between January 2014 and March 2024. Patients were divided into G-CSF and non-G-CSF (nG-CSF) groups. We assessed the incidence of neutropenia, its severity and duration; duration of hospitalization and its costs; incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and septic shock; duration of antibiotic therapy (ABT) and antifungal therapy (AFT); complete remission (CR) rates; measurable residual disease (MRD) status; relapse rates; and outcomes.
Results
G-CSF administration significantly reduced the duration of neutropenia (median 14 vs. 18 days, p < 0.05) and length of hospitalization (median 28 vs. 35 days, p < 0.05), in both induction and consolidation therapy. There were no significant differences in CR rates (73% vs. 67%, p = 0.64), MRD negativity achievement (52% vs. 48%, p = 0.68), leukemia relapse rates (43% vs. 62%, p = 0.14), or overall survival (OS) (median 16.7 vs. 12.3 months, p = 0.3) between G-CSF and nG-CSF groups. Thanks to a shorter hospitalization, the use of G-CSF led to €300,000 in savings over the last 4 years.
Conclusions
Our findings support the safety of G-CSF in AML patients, demonstrating no adverse impact on treatment response. G-CSF abbreviated the duration of neutropenia and hospitalization, highlighting its potential clinical and cost-effective role in AML treatment.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.