MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5339/qmj.2026.13

Медицинская библиотека · Qatar medical journal · 2026

A retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes in the use of inhaled nitric oxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19: The NITRICOVID study.

Peediyakkal Mohamed Zuhail Kizhakka, Al Maslamani Muna A Rahman, Kannappilly Nevin, Sidhique Saifil, Aboukamar Mohamed, Mohan Sreekanth Komath, Iype Jintu, Chaudhary Virendra Pratap, Thurakkal Ashib, Shaik Karimulla Shakeer, Allafi Solaiman, Nashwan Abdulqadir, Al LObaney Nabeel F Suleiman

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a leading cause of mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), a selective pulmonary vasodilator, is often used as rescue therapy to improve oxygenation; however, its impact on survival remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of iNO therapy in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS and to stratify patients into Early, Delayed, and Non-Responder groups based on the timing of their oxygenation response.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 99 patients with COVID-19-related ARDS who received iNO was conducted. Patients were categorized as.

EARLY RESPONDERS: ≥20% improvement in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio within 8 h.

DELAYED RESPONDERS: ≥20% improvement in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio between 8 and 24 h.

NON-RESPONDERS NO IMPROVEMENT: <20% improvement in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio within 24 h, including those who showed in their PaO2/FiO2 ratio within 24 h of iNO initiation.Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes, including duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, and mortality, were compared.

RESULTS

Early and Delayed Responders showed significant improvement in oxygenation (mean PaO2/FiO2: 137.3 vs. 126.9 vs. 106.4; p = 0.004), with mean percentage increases of 65.3%, 56.6%, and 8.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). However, this did not translate into differences in ICU mortality (64.8%, 62.5%, and 71.4%, respectively; p = 0.81) or other hospital outcomes. Rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), methemoglobinemia, and other complications were comparable among the groups.

CONCLUSION

iNO improved oxygenation in a subset of patients with COVID-19-related ARDS but did not reduce mortality. Stratification by timing of response highlights patient heterogeneity and supports response-guided, time-limited use of iNO in critical care.

Для цитирования: Peediyakkal Mohamed Zuhail Kizhakka, Al Maslamani Muna A Rahman, Kannappilly Nevin, Sidhique Saifil, Aboukamar Mohamed, Mohan Sreekanth Komath, Iype Jintu, Chaudhary Virendra Pratap, Thurakkal Ashib, Shaik Karimulla Shakeer, Allafi Solaiman, Nashwan Abdulqadir, Al LObaney Nabeel F Suleiman. A retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes in the use of inhaled nitric oxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19: The NITRICOVID study.. Qatar medical journal. 2026. DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2026.13.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.