MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/gepi.10238

Медицинская библиотека · Genetic epidemiology · 2003

Exploring the "two-hit hypothesis" in NF2: tests of two-hit and three-hit models of vestibular schwannoma development.

Woods Ryan, Friedman J M, Evans D Gareth R, Baser Michael E, Joe Harry

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) is a genetic disease that occurs in approximately 1 in 40,000 live births. Almost all affected individuals develop bilateral tumors of Schwann cells that surround the vestibular nerves; these tumors are known as vestibular schwannomas (VS). Evidence from molecular genetic studies suggests that at least two mutations are involved in formation of VS in patients with NF2. Several authors proposed probabilistic models for this process in other tumors, and showed that such models are consistent with incidence data. We evaluated two different probabilistic models for a "2-hit" hypothesis for VS development in NF2 patients, and we present results from fitting these models to incidence data. Molecular evidence does not exclude the possibility that additional hits are necessary for the development of VS, and we also assessed a "3-hit" model for tumor formation. The "3-hit" model fits the data marginally better than one of the "2-hit" models and much better than the other "2-hit" model. Our findings suggest that more than two mutations may be necessary for VS development in NF2 patients.

Для цитирования: Woods Ryan, Friedman J M, Evans D Gareth R, Baser Michael E, Joe Harry. Exploring the "two-hit hypothesis" in NF2: tests of two-hit and three-hit models of vestibular schwannoma development.. Genetic epidemiology. 2003. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10238.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.