MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.06.011

Медицинская библиотека · Fertility and sterility · 2025

Impact on clinical outcomes of membership in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Diego Daniela, Pipia Ilissa, Traub Ariana, Beroukhim Gabriela, Saleh Farrah, Toner James P, Spandorfer Steven

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare attributes and clinical outcomes of clinics affiliated with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) with those not affiliated.

DESIGN

Observational cross-sectional study of SART and non-SART member clinics using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data from 2021.

SUBJECTS: Aggregate clinic summaries from all US assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics.

EXPOSURE: None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oversight mechanisms and pregnancy outcomes of SART and non-SART clinics were compared. Specifically, live birth rates (LBRs) (per intended retrieval, completed retrieval, and first embryo transfer), singleton, term, normal-weight deliveries (per intended retrieval, completed retrieval, and first embryo transfer), and multifetal and miscarriage rates in SART and non-SART clinics were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 496 US ART clinics in 2021, 72.8% were SART members. Among the non-SART clinics, 17.7% reported directly to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and 9.4% did not report at all (a violation of federal law). The SART clinics had higher LBRs per retrieval than non-SART clinics across all age groups (age of <35 years, 54.87% vs. 45.7% age of 35-37 years, 40.82% vs. 34.59%; age of 38-40 years, 26.14% vs. 20.45%; age of >40 years, 10.38% vs. 6.02%). The SART clinics also had higher LBRs of singleton, term, normal-weight infants than non-SART clinics (age of <35 years, 42.47% vs. 29.54%; age of 35-37 years, 31.71% vs. 25.11%; age of 38-40 years, 21.28% vs. 15.74%; age of >40 years, 8.11% vs. 4.05%). In addition, rates of multifetal gestation and miscarriage were lower in SART clinics than in non-SART clinics across all age groups.

CONCLUSION

The SART clinics demonstrated better ART clinical outcomes than non-SART clinics, likely due to enhanced regulatory oversight, including the following: higher LBRs when compared per cycle start, per oocyte retrieval, and per embryo transfer; higher rates of singleton, full-term live births of normal-weight infants; lower rates of multifetal delivery; and lower rates of miscarriage.

Для цитирования: Diego Daniela, Pipia Ilissa, Traub Ariana, Beroukhim Gabriela, Saleh Farrah, Toner James P, Spandorfer Steven. Impact on clinical outcomes of membership in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.. Fertility and sterility. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.06.011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.