MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1109/isbi45749.2020.9098599

Медицинская библиотека · Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2020

LEARNING TO DETECT BRAIN LESIONS FROM NOISY ANNOTATIONS.

Karimi Davood, Peters Jurriaan M, Ouaalam Abdelhakim, Prabhu Sanjay P, Sahin Mustafa, Krueger Darcy A, Kolevzon Alexander, Eng Charis, Warfield Simon K, Gholipour Ali

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Supervised training of deep neural networks in medical imaging applications relies heavily on expert-provided annotations. These annotations, however, are often imperfect, as voxel-by-voxel labeling of structures on 3D images is difficult and laborious. In this paper, we focus on one common type of label imperfection, namely, false negatives. Focusing on brain lesion detection, we propose a method to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) to segment lesions while simultaneously improving the quality of the training labels by identifying false negatives and adding them to the training labels. To identify lesions missed by annotators in the training data, our method makes use of the 1) CNN predictions, 2) prediction uncertainty estimated during training, and 3) prior knowledge about lesion size and features. On a dataset of 165 scans of children with tuberous sclerosis complex from five centers, our method achieved better lesion detection and segmentation accuracy than the baseline CNN trained on the noisy labels, and than several alternative techniques.

Для цитирования: Karimi Davood, Peters Jurriaan M, Ouaalam Abdelhakim, Prabhu Sanjay P, Sahin Mustafa, Krueger Darcy A, Kolevzon Alexander, Eng Charis, Warfield Simon K, Gholipour Ali. LEARNING TO DETECT BRAIN LESIONS FROM NOISY ANNOTATIONS.. Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging. 2020. DOI: 10.1109/isbi45749.2020.9098599.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.