MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2004.014605

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of sports medicine · 2005

An assessment of injuries in college cheerleading: distribution, frequency, and associated factors.

Jacobson B H, Redus B, Palmer T

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Over 50% of all catastrophic injuries in women's sport occur in cheerleading, but unlike other sports, no central tracking system exists.

OBJECTIVE

To obtain, describe, and compare cheerleading injury data and associated factors.

METHODS

Cheerleaders from randomly chosen division IA universities completed surveys designed to acquire basic information and data on injury frequency, type, and location, practice frequency and duration, and related factors.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 440) were aged 18-23 (mean (SD) 20.2 (1.8)) with 6.6 (2.2) years of experience. Most respondents (78%) reported having suffered one or more career injury. Of those injured, 39.7% reported an injury within the preceding year. Respondents sustained 1.0 (0.91) injuries during the preceding year with 1.8 (2.2) days lost. Ankles (44.9%) and wrist/hand (19.3%) were the most commonly injured. Practice frequency and duration were 205 (61.5) days a year (range 80-300) and 2.8 (0.7) hours (range 1.5-4) respectively. Training included stretching (99.7%), endurance activities (87.1%), and weight training (92.9%).

CONCLUSION

Guidelines and policy governing cheerleading should be developed according to mandatory injury reporting similar to that currently used in other sports.

Для цитирования: Jacobson B H, Redus B, Palmer T. An assessment of injuries in college cheerleading: distribution, frequency, and associated factors.. British journal of sports medicine. 2005. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.014605.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.