American journal of translational research · 2024
Efficacy and inflammatory responses of root canal therapy plus periodontal non-surgical treatment for periodontal-endodontic combined dental lesions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ye Qi, Wei Dixin, Chen Zhiying, Zhang Wenhao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and inflammatory responses of treating periodontal-endodontic combined lesions (PECLs) with root canal therapy (RCT) alone versus RCT combined with periodontal non-surgical treatment (PNST).
METHODS: A total of 103 patients with PECLs admitted between January 2019 and January 2020 to Shenzhen Baoan Women's and Children's Hospital were divided into control (RCT alone, 50 cases) and combined (RCT + PNST, 53 cases) groups. Comparative analyses included efficacy assessment, probing depth (PD), bleeding index (BI), plaque index (PLI), gingival index (GI), serum levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), pain severity during RCT, incidence of adverse reactions, post-treatment tooth conditions, and recurrence rates at 6 and 12 months. Univariate analysis identified factors associated with poor treatment outcome in PECL patients.
RESULTS: The combined group demonstrated a higher total effective rate (90.57%) compared to the control group (74.00%) (P < 0.05). Patients receiving combined therapy showed significantly lower PD, BI, PLI, GI, IL-1β, TNF-α, and hs-CRP levels, as well as reduced pain severity and lower recurrence rates at 6 and 12 months (all P < 0.05). The combined group also had a lower incidence of adverse (periodontal distending pain and local foreign body sensation) reactions (7.54%) compared to the control group (26.00%) (P < 0.05). After treatment, the incidence of periodontitis, percussion tenderness, and loosening of teeth in the combined group was lower than that of the control group, and the retention rate of affected teeth was significantly higher (all P < 0.05). Factors such as history of alcoholism, betel nut chewing, and treatment method (RCT) were significantly associated with poorer prognosis in PECL patients (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Combined RCT and PNST improves clinical efficacy, reduces pain severity and inflammation levels, decreases adverse reactions, and enhances tooth retention in PECL patients. This treatment approach should be considered the preferred option for managing PECLs.
METHODS: A total of 103 patients with PECLs admitted between January 2019 and January 2020 to Shenzhen Baoan Women's and Children's Hospital were divided into control (RCT alone, 50 cases) and combined (RCT + PNST, 53 cases) groups. Comparative analyses included efficacy assessment, probing depth (PD), bleeding index (BI), plaque index (PLI), gingival index (GI), serum levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), pain severity during RCT, incidence of adverse reactions, post-treatment tooth conditions, and recurrence rates at 6 and 12 months. Univariate analysis identified factors associated with poor treatment outcome in PECL patients.
RESULTS: The combined group demonstrated a higher total effective rate (90.57%) compared to the control group (74.00%) (P < 0.05). Patients receiving combined therapy showed significantly lower PD, BI, PLI, GI, IL-1β, TNF-α, and hs-CRP levels, as well as reduced pain severity and lower recurrence rates at 6 and 12 months (all P < 0.05). The combined group also had a lower incidence of adverse (periodontal distending pain and local foreign body sensation) reactions (7.54%) compared to the control group (26.00%) (P < 0.05). After treatment, the incidence of periodontitis, percussion tenderness, and loosening of teeth in the combined group was lower than that of the control group, and the retention rate of affected teeth was significantly higher (all P < 0.05). Factors such as history of alcoholism, betel nut chewing, and treatment method (RCT) were significantly associated with poorer prognosis in PECL patients (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Combined RCT and PNST improves clinical efficacy, reduces pain severity and inflammation levels, decreases adverse reactions, and enhances tooth retention in PECL patients. This treatment approach should be considered the preferred option for managing PECLs.