Obstetrics and gynecology · 1984
Comparison between human urinary follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropin treatment in polycystic ovary.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Venturoli S, Paradisi R, Fabbri R, Magrini O, Porcu E, Flamigni C
Аннотация
Five infertile patients with polycystic ovarian disease were treated to induce ovulation with pure human urinary follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropin consisting of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in 1:1 ratio. No substantial differences were seen between the two types of treatment regarding plasma values of follicle-stimulating hormone, prolactin, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, progesterone, and 17-hydroxyprogesterone. Estrone, estradiol, and androstenedione values were higher during human urinary follicle-stimulating hormone treatments. Luteinizing hormone levels dropped in both treatments, but the fall was greater during human urinary follicle-stimulating hormone. No real differences were observed concerning number of ovulations, length of treatments, and follicle-stimulating hormone amounts administered; no hyperstimulations were observed. These data do not confirm the observation that more controlled responses of the ovaries can be elicited when low luteinizing hormone gonadotropin preparations are used.