MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.23750/abm.v93i2.11031

Медицинская библиотека · Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022

Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis on real world data.

Riccò Matteo, Ranzieri Silvia, Peruzzi Simona, Valente Marina, Marchesi Federico, Bragazzi Nicola Luigi, Donelli Davide, Balzarini Federica, Ferraro Pietro, Gianfredi Vincenza, Signorelli Carlo

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Background and aim Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests on nasopharyngeal specimens have been recently made available for SARS-CoV-2 infections, and early studies suggested their potential utilization as rapid screening and diagnostic testing. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to assess available evidence and to explore the reliability of antigenic tests in the management of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We reported our meta-analysis according to the PRISMA statement. We searched Pubmed, Embase, and pre-print archive medRxiv.og for eligible studies published up to November 5th, 2020. Raw data included true/false positive and negative tests, and the total number of tests. Sensitivity and specificity data were calculated for every study, and then pooled in a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 measure. Reporting bias was assessed by means of funnel plots and regression analysis.

RESULTS

Based on 25 studies, we computed a pooled sensitivity of 72.8% (95%CI 62.4-81.3), a specificity of 99.4% (95%CI 99.0-99.7), with high heterogeneity and risk of reporting bias. More precisely, RAD tests exhibited higher sensitivity on samples with high viral load (i.e. <25 Cycle Threshold; 97.6%; 95%CI 94.1-99.0), compared to those with low viral load (≥25 Cycle Threshold; 43.6%; 95% 27.6-61.1).

DISCUSSION: As the majority of collected reports were either cohort or case-control studies, deprived of preventive power analysis and often oversampling positive tests, overall performances may have been overestimated. Therefore, the massive referral to antigenic tests in place of RT-qPCR is currently questionable, and also their deployment as mass screening test may lead to intolerable share of missing diagnoses. On the other hand, RAD tests may find a significant role in primary care and in front-line settings (e.g. Emergency Departments). (www.actabiomedica.it).

Для цитирования: Riccò Matteo, Ranzieri Silvia, Peruzzi Simona, Valente Marina, Marchesi Federico, Bragazzi Nicola Luigi, Donelli Davide, Balzarini Federica, Ferraro Pietro, Gianfredi Vincenza, Signorelli Carlo. Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis on real world data.. Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis. 2022. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v93i2.11031.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.