[Computerized interpretation of the electrocardiogram in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. The ELECTROPRES project].

INTRODUCTION

Despite its low sensitivity, the electrocardiogram (ECG) is the tool used the most in the daily practice for detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). This study has aimed to assess the impact of the computerized interpretation of the ECG on the diagnosis of LVH in the practical clinical setting.

METHODS

ELECTROPRES is a project based on a free access computer platform that permits an online interpretation of the electrocardiogram. It includes 19 different left LVH criteria previously validated by echocardiography in a substudy. We analyzed the data from the first 669 patients with essential arterial hypertension (ATH) included in the ELECTROPRES platform from 21 primary care centers in 9 of the 17 Spanish autonomous communities.

RESULTS

Up to April 2010, a cohort of 669 hypertensive patients (51.7% women), with a mean age of 66.3±11.89 years, was analyzed. The mean evolution of the disease was 8 years, and the patients had been receiving an average of 2.4 antihypertensive agents. Systolic blood pressure was 139±17 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure 76±11. The ECG-known frequency of LVH was 3%. The prevalence of LVH increased up to 33.3% (P<0.001) with the ELECTROPRES platform. When all the criteria were independently examined, the Lewis index (R-I+S-III) and the Cornell product [(R-aVL+S-V3 (+6 for women)] were those in which the most cases of left ventricular hypertrophy were detected (24.8% and 13.3%, respectively). The Lewis index and the Cornell product were the criteria that detected more cases of left ventricular hypertrophy, regardless of the AHT stage and of the presence of cardiovascular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The ECG computerized reading (ELECTROPRES platform) significantly increases detection of left ventricular hypertrophy in a population of essential hypertense subjects compared to conventional detection with the ECG by the physician in the usual clinical practice setting.