MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/circep.123.012567

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2023

Multicenter, Phase 2, Randomized Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Etripamil Nasal Spray for the Acute Reduction of Rapid Ventricular Rate in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation (ReVeRA-201).

Camm A John, Piccini Jonathan P, Alings Marco, Dorian Paul, Gosselin Gilbert, Guertin Marie-Claude, Ip James E, Kowey Peter R, Mondésert Blandine, Prins Fransisco J, Roux Jean-Francois, Stambler Bruce S, van Eck Jwm, Al Windy Nadea, Thermil Nathalie, Shardonofsky Silvia, Bharucha David B, Roy Denis

Рандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеКлиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Despite chronic therapies, atrial fibrillation (AF) leads to rapid ventricular rates (RVR) often requiring intravenous treatments. Etripamil is a fast-acting, calcium-channel blocker administered intranasally affecting the atrioventricular node within minutes.

METHODS

Reduction of Ventricular Rate in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation evaluated the efficacy and safety of etripamil for the reduction of ventricular rate (VR) in patients presenting urgently with AF-RVR (VR ≥110 beats per minute [bpm]), was randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and conducted in Canada and the Netherlands. Patients presenting urgently with AF-RVR were randomized (1:1, etripamil nasal spray 70 mg: placebo nasal spray). The primary objective was to demonstrate the effectiveness of etripamil in reducing VR in AF-RVR within 60 minutes of treatment. Secondary objectives assessed achievement of VR <100 bpm, reduction by ≥10% and ≥20%, relief of symptoms and treatment effectiveness; adverse events; and additional measures to 360 minutes.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were randomized, 56 dosed with etripamil (n=27) or placebo (n=29). The median age was 65 years; 39% were female patients; proportions of AF types were similar between groups. The difference of mean maximum reductions in VR over 60 minutes, etripamil versus placebo, adjusting for baseline VR, was -29.91 bpm (95% CI, -40.31 to -19.52; P<0.0001). VR reductions persisted up to 150 minutes. Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving etripamil achieved VR reductions <100 bpm (with longer median duration <100 bpm), or VR reduction by ≥10% or ≥20%, versus placebo. VR reduction ≥20% occurred in 66.7% of patients in the etripamil arm and no patients in placebo. Using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9, there was significant improvement in satisfaction on symptom relief and treatment effectiveness with etripamil versus placebo. Serious adverse events were rare; 1 patient in the etripamil arm experienced transient severe bradycardia and syncope, assessed as due to hypervagotonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Intranasal etripamil 70 mg reduced VR and improved symptom relief and treatment satisfaction. These data support further development of self-administered etripamil for the treatment of AF-RVR.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT04467905.

Для цитирования: Camm A John, Piccini Jonathan P, Alings Marco, Dorian Paul, Gosselin Gilbert, Guertin Marie-Claude, Ip James E, Kowey Peter R, Mondésert Blandine, Prins Fransisco J, Roux Jean-Francois, Stambler Bruce S, van Eck Jwm, Al Windy Nadea, Thermil Nathalie, Shardonofsky Silvia, Bharucha David B, Roy Denis. Multicenter, Phase 2, Randomized Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Etripamil Nasal Spray for the Acute Reduction of Rapid Ventricular Rate in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation (ReVeRA-201).. Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2023. DOI: 10.1161/circep.123.012567.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.