Nutrition & metabolism · 2025
Ultra-processed food intake, diet quality, and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional analysis from the Mutaba'ah study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Almulla Aisha A, Augustin Hanna, Ahmed Luai A, Bärebring Linnea
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: High intake of Ultra-Processed Foods (UPF) has raised concerns about how they might impact maternal diet and potentially increase the risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to evaluate the associations between UPF intake or adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and GDM among pregnant women in the United Arab Emirates.
METHODS: Pregnant women (n = 1054) from the dietary subcohort within the prospective Mutaba'ah Study cohort were included. Diet was assessed through a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, and UPF intake in servings/day was classified according to the NOVA system. The alternate Mediterranean Diet (aMED) score specific for pregnancy defined adherence to the Mediterranean Diet. GDM diagnosis was based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence criteria. Logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age, first trimester body mass index, parity, gestational age, education level, employment status, physical activity, and husband's smoking status were used to assess associations between UPF intake or aMED score and GDM.
RESULTS: Mean ± SD UPF intake was 9.4 ± 3.4 servings/day and mean aMED score was 4.0 ± 1.5. Women in the highest tertile of UPF intake had lower aMED score than those in the lowest tertile (4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 3.6 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). Women in the highest tertile of UPF intake had higher intakes of carbohydrates, saturated fatty acids, sodium, and selenium than those in the lowest tertile, while intakes of protein, total fat, monounsaturated fatty acids, and most micronutrients were lower (P < 0.05). Neither tertiles of UPF intake (third tertile compared to the lowest OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.54-1.34) nor continuous UPF intake (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-1.03) was associated with GDM. Similarly, aMED score was not associated with GDM in either tertile of the score (third tertile compared to the lowest OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.54-1.64) or as a continuous variable (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.87-1.11).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher intake of UPF was associated with a lower adherence to the Mediterranean Diet. However, neither UPF intake nor aMED score was associated with GDM.
METHODS: Pregnant women (n = 1054) from the dietary subcohort within the prospective Mutaba'ah Study cohort were included. Diet was assessed through a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, and UPF intake in servings/day was classified according to the NOVA system. The alternate Mediterranean Diet (aMED) score specific for pregnancy defined adherence to the Mediterranean Diet. GDM diagnosis was based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence criteria. Logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age, first trimester body mass index, parity, gestational age, education level, employment status, physical activity, and husband's smoking status were used to assess associations between UPF intake or aMED score and GDM.
RESULTS: Mean ± SD UPF intake was 9.4 ± 3.4 servings/day and mean aMED score was 4.0 ± 1.5. Women in the highest tertile of UPF intake had lower aMED score than those in the lowest tertile (4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 3.6 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). Women in the highest tertile of UPF intake had higher intakes of carbohydrates, saturated fatty acids, sodium, and selenium than those in the lowest tertile, while intakes of protein, total fat, monounsaturated fatty acids, and most micronutrients were lower (P < 0.05). Neither tertiles of UPF intake (third tertile compared to the lowest OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.54-1.34) nor continuous UPF intake (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-1.03) was associated with GDM. Similarly, aMED score was not associated with GDM in either tertile of the score (third tertile compared to the lowest OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.54-1.64) or as a continuous variable (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.87-1.11).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher intake of UPF was associated with a lower adherence to the Mediterranean Diet. However, neither UPF intake nor aMED score was associated with GDM.