MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11604-006-0062-x

Медицинская библиотека · Radiation medicine · 2006

Unusual behavior of foreign body granuloma that grew rapidly in the radiation field during radiation therapy.

Nomiya Takuma, Teruyama Kazuhide, Yamada Shogo, Takahashi Satsuki, Saito Masahiro

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report our experience with two cases of a rapidly growing benign tumor in the radiation field despite radiotherapy. Case 1 was a 75-year-old man who was diagnosed as having postoperative recurrence of esophageal carcinoma in the right chest wall and underwent radiotherapy. A small nodule in the recurrent lesion grew to 20 mm in diameter at 70 Gy. The biopsy specimen was diagnosed as foreign body granuloma (FBG) with no malignancy. Case 2 was a 78-year-old woman who was diagnosed with axillary lymph node metastases of operated lung cancer and underwent lymphadenectomy and postoperative radiotherapy. No subcutaneous tumor was seen at the beginning of radiotherapy. However, a small nodule appeared in the radiation field at 40 Gy, and it had grown to 30 mm in diameter at 70 Gy. The biopsy specimen was diagnosed as FBG, showing granulation because of a remnant of surgical suture. Both FBGs disappeared within 3-6 months after radiotherapy. In cases in which a tumor has arisen from a site where surgical treatment had been performed and the tumor shows unnatural growth despite radiotherapy, FBG should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Для цитирования: Nomiya Takuma, Teruyama Kazuhide, Yamada Shogo, Takahashi Satsuki, Saito Masahiro. Unusual behavior of foreign body granuloma that grew rapidly in the radiation field during radiation therapy.. Radiation medicine. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-006-0062-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.