MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1753193415620177

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hand surgery, European volume · 2015

Use of digital images to aid in the decision-making for acute upper extremity trauma referral.

Plant M A, Novak C B, McCabe S J, von Schroeder H P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the use of digital smartphone images in the decision-making for acute upper extremity trauma referrals. Surgeons (n = 15) were presented with ten upper limb trauma scenarios for consideration of immediate transfer. Based on verbal history and with additional images, participants were asked questions regarding diagnosis, injured tissues, recommended management and diagnostic and treatment confidence. Statistical analyses evaluated confidence level changes and relationships between confidence levels and independent variables. Confidence levels for diagnosis and treatment were increased with the provision of smartphone images, and this was statistically significant. The decision to transfer was changed in 22%. The photographs were more useful for amputation versus non-amputation injuries (diagnosis and treatment) and hand versus forearm injuries (diagnosis), and these differences reached statistical significance. Smartphone digital images were shown to be useful for decision-making in acute upper extremity trauma referrals. This improved communication may have implications for health cost savings and patient burden by minimizing unnecessary acute transfers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III.

Для цитирования: Plant M A, Novak C B, McCabe S J, von Schroeder H P. Use of digital images to aid in the decision-making for acute upper extremity trauma referral.. The Journal of hand surgery, European volume. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1753193415620177.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.