MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/nau.25654

Медицинская библиотека · Neurourology and urodynamics · 2025

Do We Have Sufficient Evidence to Derive Innovative Approaches to Assessing Unmet Need, Delivering Education on Bladder and Bowel Continence Health, and Providing a Better Environment for Joint Decision-Making? ICI-RS 2024.

Cotterill Nikki, Samarinas Michael, Rantell Angie, Selai Caroline, Arlandis Salvador, Jones Kathryn, Abrams Paul, Robinson D, Wagg Adrian

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

CONTEXT: Improved continence outcomes are reliant on identification of unmet need, education delivery, and shared decision-making. The evidence base on which to derive innovative approaches in these areas was unclear.

METHODS

A debate held at the International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society meeting, held in Bristol in June 2024, considered ways to improve research requirements to advance these areas.

RESULTS AND

CONCLUSION

Artificial intelligence solutions and digital approaches to healthcare are emerging at pace and offer possibilities to improve these three key areas but this must be driven by person-centered approaches. Care must be taken to avoid increasing inequality through digital exclusion and language barriers. Research questions are highlighted to derive innovation in these three key areas.

Для цитирования: Cotterill Nikki, Samarinas Michael, Rantell Angie, Selai Caroline, Arlandis Salvador, Jones Kathryn, Abrams Paul, Robinson D, Wagg Adrian. Do We Have Sufficient Evidence to Derive Innovative Approaches to Assessing Unmet Need, Delivering Education on Bladder and Bowel Continence Health, and Providing a Better Environment for Joint Decision-Making? ICI-RS 2024.. Neurourology and urodynamics. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/nau.25654.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.