MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3233/shti230525

Медицинская библиотека · Studies in health technology and informatics · 2023

Recurrent vs Non-Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks for Heart Sound Classification.

Gharehbaghi Arash, Partovi Elaheh, Babic Ankica

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) has been widely proposed for different tasks of heart sound analysis. This paper presents the results of a novel study on the performance of a conventional CNN in comparison to the different architectures of recurrent neural networks combined with CNN for the classification task of abnormal-normal heart sounds. The study considers various combinations of parallel and cascaded integration of CNN with Gated Recurrent Network (GRN) as well as Long- Short Term Memory (LSTM) and explores the accuracy and sensitivity of each integration independently, using the Physionet dataset of heart sound recordings. The accuracy of the parallel architecture of LSTM-CNN reached 98.0% outperforming all the combined architectures, with a sensitivity of 87.2%. The conventional CNN offered sensitivity/accuracy of 95.9%/97.3% with far less complexity. Results show that a conventional CNN can appropriately perform and solely employed for the classification of heart sound signals.

Для цитирования: Gharehbaghi Arash, Partovi Elaheh, Babic Ankica. Recurrent vs Non-Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks for Heart Sound Classification.. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2023. DOI: 10.3233/shti230525.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.