MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12879-025-11982-4

Медицинская библиотека · BMC infectious diseases · 2025

Clinical efficacy and safety of eravacycline for the treatment of enterococcal infections: a subpopulation analysis.

Helden Sean R Van, Coyne Ashlan J Kunz, Alosaimy Sara, Molina Kyle C, Kang-Birken S Lena, Andrade Justin, King Madeline A, Claeys Kimberly C, Hobbs Athena L V, Perkins Iii Nicholson B, Agee Jazmin, DeKerlegand Alaina, Biagi Mark, Veve Michael P, Tart Serina, Gore Tristan, Jones Bruce M, Pullinger Benjamin M, Schrack Melanie Rae, Cosimi Reese, Herbin Shelbye R, Judd Chloe, Musawa Mohammed Al, Rybak Michael J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Infections due to Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are common in the hospital setting and carry a high risk for morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the incidence of drug-resistant phenotypes, such as vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) and daptomycin non-susceptible strains, is increasing. Eravacycline (ERV) is a novel tetracycline antibiotic approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections and possesses a broad spectrum of activity across both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, including VRE, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

METHODS

We conducted a subgroup analysis assessing the real-world efficacy and safety of ERV for the treatment of enterococcal infections. Adult patients who received ERV for ≥ 72 h for E. faecalis or E. faecium infections were included. The primary outcome of clinical cure was defined as resolution or improvement of infection-related signs and/or symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis. E. faecalis and E. faecium were present in 44% and 58% of patients, respectively, and 49% of all isolates were VRE. The most prevalent infection types were intra-abdominal, skin/soft tissue, and osteomyelitis, and a majority (80%) of infections were polymicrobial. Clinical cure was achieved in 77% of patients. Thirty-day mortality was 17% and 30-day infection-related mortality was 12%. Thirty-day hospital readmission rate was 14%, and microbiological recurrence occurred in 4% of patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 8% of patients, with 2% of patients requiring discontinuation of ERV.

CONCLUSION

This study describes the real-world safety and efficacy of ERV for the treatment of enterococcal infections.

Для цитирования: Helden Sean R Van, Coyne Ashlan J Kunz, Alosaimy Sara, Molina Kyle C, Kang-Birken S Lena, Andrade Justin, King Madeline A, Claeys Kimberly C, Hobbs Athena L V, Perkins Iii Nicholson B, Agee Jazmin, DeKerlegand Alaina, Biagi Mark, Veve Michael P, Tart Serina, Gore Tristan, Jones Bruce M, Pullinger Benjamin M, Schrack Melanie Rae, Cosimi Reese, Herbin Shelbye R, Judd Chloe, Musawa Mohammed Al, Rybak Michael J. Clinical efficacy and safety of eravacycline for the treatment of enterococcal infections: a subpopulation analysis.. BMC infectious diseases. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-025-11982-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.