MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.09.008

Медицинская библиотека · Medical engineering & physics · 2019

Comparison of pullout strength of pedicle screws following revision using larger diameter screws.

Varghese Vicky, Krishnan Venkatesh, Kumar Gurunathan Saravana

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Pedicle screw fixation and fusion are the gold standard for the treatment of spinal instability. Screw failures such as pullout and breakages have been reported during the past several years of research and development in this field. Further, the rate of revision surgeries due to failed pedicle screws is around 2-12%. This creates unavoidable hardship to the patients. Improper screw size for revision surgery can lead to complications such as pedicle fractures, screw pullout, or reduced stability of the fusion construct. We performed pullout strength studies on five osteoporotic lumbar vertebra and a rigid polyurethane foam block to find the effect of the outer diameter of revision screws as per American Standards for Testing of Materials (ASTM) 543-07 protocol. The present study revealed that whereas the use of revision screws that were one millimeter greater in diameter than the original screws decreased the pullout strength by 79% in the foam model, the pullout strength increased by 121% when the original index screws were replaced with screws that were two millimeters greater in diameter. The effect of revision screw diameter on pullout strength was significant (p < 0.05). Cadaveric testing reveals a trend that agrees with the foam model tests.

Для цитирования: Varghese Vicky, Krishnan Venkatesh, Kumar Gurunathan Saravana. Comparison of pullout strength of pedicle screws following revision using larger diameter screws.. Medical engineering & physics. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.09.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.