MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043363

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2021

Effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in adult patients undergoing dental procedures: a systematic review.

Araújo Jimmy de Oliveira, Bergamaschi Cristiane de Cássia, Lopes Luciane Cruz, Guimarães Caio Chaves, de Andrade Natalia Karol, Ramacciato Juliana Cama, Motta Rogério Heládio Lopes

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

It can be challenging to manage patients who are anxious during dental procedures. There is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in adults. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in patients undergoing dental procedures.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) compared the oral use of benzodiazepines and other medications with a placebo or other oral agents in adult patients. A search of the Cochrane (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid) and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (via Ovid) databases was conducted, without any restrictions on language or date of publication. The primary outcomes included the adverse effects and anxiety level. The secondary outcomes included sedation, satisfaction with the treatment, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation. Reviewers, independently and in pairs, assessed each citation for eligibility, performed the data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. A narrative synthesis of the data was provided.

RESULTS

A number of RCTs (n=327 patients) assessed the use of benzodiazepines (n=9) and herbal medicines (n=3). We found good satisfaction with treatment after the use of midazolam 7.5 mg or clonidine 150 µg and reduced anxiety with alprazolam (0.5 and 0.75 mg). Midazolam 15 mg promoted greater anxiety reduction than Passiflora incarnata L. 260 mg, while Valeriana officinalis 100 mg and Erythrina mulungu 500 mg were more effective than a placebo. More patients reported adverse effects with midazolam 15 mg. Diazepam 15 mg and V. officinalis 100 mg promoted less change in the heart rate and blood pressure than a placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limitations of the findings due to the quality of the included studies and the different comparisons made between interventions, further RCTs are required to confirm the effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in dentistry.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017057142.

Для цитирования: Araújo Jimmy de Oliveira, Bergamaschi Cristiane de Cássia, Lopes Luciane Cruz, Guimarães Caio Chaves, de Andrade Natalia Karol, Ramacciato Juliana Cama, Motta Rogério Heládio Lopes. Effectiveness and safety of oral sedation in adult patients undergoing dental procedures: a systematic review.. BMJ open. 2021. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043363.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.