Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026
Efficacy of minocycline versus pristinamycin-based regimens for the treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infections: a scoping review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fernández-Huerta Miguel, Moure Zaira, Torrecillas Miriam, Fidalgo Berta, Fernández Ignacio, Trejo-Zahínos Jesús, Serra-Pladevall Judit, Espasa-Soley Mateu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In the current scenario where dual-class resistance to both macrolides and fluoroquinolones in M. genitalium is emerging, alternatives are scarce.
OBJECTIVES: We aim to estimate the efficacy of minocycline and pristinamycin-based regimens for the treatment of M. genitalium infections.
METHODS: On November 2025, two independent Boolean searches were performed in PubMed using the MeSH terms " Mycoplasma genitalium " AND "minocycline", and " Mycoplasma genitalium " AND "pristinamycin", respectively, to identify manuscripts reporting treatment outcomes in M. genitalium urogenital infections using minocycline and/or pristinamycin-based regimens. Regarding minocycline, six original research studies were finally included for the primary outcome, accounting for 274 M. genitalium infection cases. On the other hand, six studies were also included regarding pristinamycin (three records overlapping with the other search), accounting for 223 M. genitalium cases.
RESULTS: The aggregated data estimated that the rate of treatment failure associated with minocycline was 71/274 (25.9%% CI, 20.7%-31.1%]), similar to the one estimated for pristinamycin-based therapies of 56/223 (25.1% [95% CI, 19.6%-31.3%]); P = 0.839.
CONCLUSIONS: This review provides comprehensive evidence-based data regarding the efficacy of minocycline and pristinamycin-based regimens for the treatment of M. genitalium infections. Consequently, this work presents a consolidated analysis to help support updates to clinical guidelines, suggesting the preferential use of minocycline over pristinamycin for the treatment of multidrug resistant infections due to its greater accessibility and lower cost.
OBJECTIVES: We aim to estimate the efficacy of minocycline and pristinamycin-based regimens for the treatment of M. genitalium infections.
METHODS: On November 2025, two independent Boolean searches were performed in PubMed using the MeSH terms " Mycoplasma genitalium " AND "minocycline", and " Mycoplasma genitalium " AND "pristinamycin", respectively, to identify manuscripts reporting treatment outcomes in M. genitalium urogenital infections using minocycline and/or pristinamycin-based regimens. Regarding minocycline, six original research studies were finally included for the primary outcome, accounting for 274 M. genitalium infection cases. On the other hand, six studies were also included regarding pristinamycin (three records overlapping with the other search), accounting for 223 M. genitalium cases.
RESULTS: The aggregated data estimated that the rate of treatment failure associated with minocycline was 71/274 (25.9%% CI, 20.7%-31.1%]), similar to the one estimated for pristinamycin-based therapies of 56/223 (25.1% [95% CI, 19.6%-31.3%]); P = 0.839.
CONCLUSIONS: This review provides comprehensive evidence-based data regarding the efficacy of minocycline and pristinamycin-based regimens for the treatment of M. genitalium infections. Consequently, this work presents a consolidated analysis to help support updates to clinical guidelines, suggesting the preferential use of minocycline over pristinamycin for the treatment of multidrug resistant infections due to its greater accessibility and lower cost.