American journal of botany · 2024
Fisher's automatic advantage of self-fertilization does not apply in cleistogamous species.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cheptou Pierre-Olivier
Аннотация
PREMISE: In hermaphroditic plants, the evolution of self-fertilization is driven by two major forces; the cost of outcrossing or Fisher's automatic advantage of selfing and inbreeding depression. Seminal theoretical works have established that an inbreeding depression threshold of 0.5 governs the evolution. Below that threshold, selfing evolves, above that, outcrossing evolves. Does this threshold apply to cleistogamous plants?
METHODS: I developed a model using a Lloydian approach to analyze the evolution of cleistogamy.
RESULTS: I showed that the inbreeding depression threshold does not apply in cleistogamous species, and that because cleistogamous (closed) flowers do not export pollen, Fisher's advantage of selfing is totally cancelled.
CONCLUSIONS: In line with model predictions, I discuss the fact that cleistogamous species often exhibit low inbreeding depression in empirical studies.
METHODS: I developed a model using a Lloydian approach to analyze the evolution of cleistogamy.
RESULTS: I showed that the inbreeding depression threshold does not apply in cleistogamous species, and that because cleistogamous (closed) flowers do not export pollen, Fisher's advantage of selfing is totally cancelled.
CONCLUSIONS: In line with model predictions, I discuss the fact that cleistogamous species often exhibit low inbreeding depression in empirical studies.