MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.12.039

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023

Multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled study of the efficacy and safety of favipiravir and nafamostat mesilate in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Ikeda Mahoko, Okugawa Shu, Kashiwabara Kosuke, Moritoyo Takashi, Kanno Yoshiaki, Jubishi Daisuke, Hashimoto Hideki, Okamoto Koh, Tsushima Kenji, Uchida Yasuki, Mitsumura Takahiro, Igari Hidetoshi, Tsutsumi Takeya, Araoka Hideki, Yatera Kazuhiro, Yamamoto Yoshihiro, Nakamura Yuki, Otani Amato, Yamashita Marie, Wakimoto Yuji, Shinohara Takayuki, Adachi-Katayama Maho, Oyabu Tatsunori, Kanematsu Aoi, Harada Sohei, Takeshita Yuichiro, Nakano Yasutaka, Miyazaki Yasunari, Sakao Seiichiro, Saito Makoto, Ogura Sho, Yamasaki Kei, Kawasuji Hitoshi, Hataji Osamu, Inoue Jun-Ichiro, Seto Yasuyuki, Moriya Kyoji

Рандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nafamostat combined with favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel assignment study in hospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive favipiravir alone (n = 24) or nafamostat with favipiravir (n = 21). The outcomes included changes in the World Health Organization clinical progression scale score, time to improvement in body temperature, and improvement in oxygen saturation (SpO2).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the changes in the clinical progression scale between nafamostat with favipiravir and favipiravir alone groups (median, -0.444 vs -0.150, respectively; least-squares mean difference, -0.294; P = 0.364). The time to improvement in body temperature was significantly shorter in the combination group (5.0 days; 95% confidence interval, 4.0-7.0) than in the favipiravir group (9.0 days; 95% confidence interval, 7.0-18.0; P =0.009). The changes in SpO2 were greater in the combination group than in the favipiravir group (0.526% vs -1.304%, respectively; least-squares mean difference, 1.831; P = 0.022). No serious adverse events or deaths were reported, but phlebitis occurred in 57.1% of the patients in the combination group.

CONCLUSION

Although our study showed no differences in clinical progression, earlier defervescence, and recovery of SpO2 were observed in the combination group.

Для цитирования: Ikeda Mahoko, Okugawa Shu, Kashiwabara Kosuke, Moritoyo Takashi, Kanno Yoshiaki, Jubishi Daisuke, Hashimoto Hideki, Okamoto Koh, Tsushima Kenji, Uchida Yasuki, Mitsumura Takahiro, Igari Hidetoshi, Tsutsumi Takeya, Araoka Hideki, Yatera Kazuhiro, Yamamoto Yoshihiro, Nakamura Yuki, Otani Amato, Yamashita Marie, Wakimoto Yuji, Shinohara Takayuki, Adachi-Katayama Maho, Oyabu Tatsunori, Kanematsu Aoi, Harada Sohei, Takeshita Yuichiro, Nakano Yasutaka, Miyazaki Yasunari, Sakao Seiichiro, Saito Makoto, Ogura Sho, Yamasaki Kei, Kawasuji Hitoshi, Hataji Osamu, Inoue Jun-Ichiro, Seto Yasuyuki, Moriya Kyoji. Multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled study of the efficacy and safety of favipiravir and nafamostat mesilate in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.. International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.12.039.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.