MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000018811

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2020

Atypical myeloproliferative neoplasm with concurrent BCR-ABL1 fusion and CALR mutation: A case report and literature review.

Liu Chunshui, Hu Ruiping, Du Zhonghua, Abecasis Manuel, Wang Cong

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

RATIONALE: Concurrent calreticulin (CALR) mutation and BCR-ABL1 fusion are extremely rare in chronic myelogenous leukemia; to date, only 12 cases have been reported.

PATIENT CONCERNS: A 57-year-old male who had an 11-year history of essential thrombocytosis presented to our hospital with leukocytosis and marked splenomegaly for 3 months.

DIAGNOSES: Chronic myelogenous leukemia with myeloid fibrosis arising on the background of essential thrombocytosis harboring both BCR-ABL1 fusion and type-1 like CALR mutation.

INTERVENTIONS: Imatinib was started at 300 mg daily and increased to 400 mg daily after 3 months; interferon was added after 12 months.

OUTCOMES: Partial cytogenetic response was achieved after 3 months of imatinib therapy and complete cytogenetic response was achieved after 1 year of treatment. However, CALR mutation was still present with a stable mutational allele burden.

LESSONS: In this case report and review of additional 12 cases with simultaneous presence of CALR-mutation and BCR-ABL1 fusion, we highlighted the importance of integrating clinical, morphological, and molecular genetic data for classifying atypical myeloid neoplasms.

Для цитирования: Liu Chunshui, Hu Ruiping, Du Zhonghua, Abecasis Manuel, Wang Cong. Atypical myeloproliferative neoplasm with concurrent BCR-ABL1 fusion and CALR mutation: A case report and literature review.. Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018811.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.