MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/tp.0000000000005851

Медицинская библиотека · Transplantation · 2026

Sequential Transplant Research: A Consensus Guideline Endorsed by the International Society for Organ Donation Professionals, the Canadian Donation and Transplant Research Program, and the Canadian Society of Transplantation.

Meade Maureen O, Cumyn Annabelle, D'Aragon Frédérick, Chaudhury Prosanto, Treleaven Darin, Parpia Sameer, Selzner Markus, Shamseddin M Khaled, Gill John S, Singh Jeffrey M, Goldberg Aviva, Basmaji John, Weijer Charles, Murphy Nicholas, Slessarev Marat, Paraskevas Steven, Burns Karen E A, Ménard Jean-Frédéric, Johnston Olwyn, Montano-Loza Aldo J, Talbot Heather E, Wang Borong, Wang Yang, Lallani Afsana, Holdsworth Sandra C, Gill Justin S, Oldani Graziano, Baig Sadia, Varughese Rhea, Brodrecht Diana N, Cook Deborah J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Sequential transplant research is the administration of distinct study interventions in sequential phases (donor, organ, recipient) of the same organ transplant. This guideline provides a framework for assessing the suitability of implementing ≥2 transplant studies sequentially.

METHODS

We applied World Health Organization guideline methodology. The guideline panel included transplant researchers, transplant patients and organ donor family members, randomized trial methodologists and biostatisticians, and research ethics scholars. Three principal themes included the impact of sequential research on patient safety, study findings, and strategies for effective implementation. The panel met on 7 occasions during 4 mo.

RESULTS

Patient safety indicates that sequential studies have potential to harm transplant recipients in 3 situations: when investigational drugs are the same in both studies, they have a classic drug-drug interaction, or they have similar adverse effects. Study findings indicates that sequential research might influence study estimates of relative risk only if 1 intervention modifies (ie, amplifies or suppresses) the effects of another. In contrast, with or without effect modification, sequential research can influence the power of a study to detect expected treatment effects. An appreciable impact on study power will only arise, however, when there is a high rate of sequential enrollment in the study population. Implementation indicates that ideally, to maximize research efficiency, independent bodies will judge the suitability of sequential research, and research organizations will develop an equitable approach to support studies found unsuitable for sequential implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline represents a starting point to advance the safe implementation of sequential trials in transplantation.

Для цитирования: Meade Maureen O, Cumyn Annabelle, D'Aragon Frédérick, Chaudhury Prosanto, Treleaven Darin, Parpia Sameer, Selzner Markus, Shamseddin M Khaled, Gill John S, Singh Jeffrey M, Goldberg Aviva, Basmaji John, Weijer Charles, Murphy Nicholas, Slessarev Marat, Paraskevas Steven, Burns Karen E A, Ménard Jean-Frédéric, Johnston Olwyn, Montano-Loza Aldo J, Talbot Heather E, Wang Borong, Wang Yang, Lallani Afsana, Holdsworth Sandra C, Gill Justin S, Oldani Graziano, Baig Sadia, Varughese Rhea, Brodrecht Diana N, Cook Deborah J. Sequential Transplant Research: A Consensus Guideline Endorsed by the International Society for Organ Donation Professionals, the Canadian Donation and Transplant Research Program, and the Canadian Society of Transplantation.. Transplantation. 2026. DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005851.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.