MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13054-024-04839-w

Медицинская библиотека · Critical care (London, England) · 2024

Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.

Arias-Ortiz Julian, Vincent Jean-Louis

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Septic shock typically requires the administration of vasopressors. Adrenergic agents remain the first choice, namely norepinephrine. However, their use to counteract life-threatening hypotension comes with potential adverse effects, so that non-adrenergic vasopressors may also be considered. The use of agents that act through different mechanisms may also provide an advantage. Nitric oxide (NO) is the main driver of the vasodilation that leads to hypotension in septic shock, so several agents have been tested to counteract its effects. The use of non-selective NO synthase inhibitors has been of questionable benefit. Methylene blue, an inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclase, an important enzyme involved in the NO signaling pathway in the vascular smooth muscle cell, has also been proposed. However, more than 25 years since the first clinical evaluation of MB administration in septic shock, the safety and benefits of its use are still not fully established, and it should not be used routinely in clinical practice until further evidence of its efficacy is available.

Для цитирования: Arias-Ortiz Julian, Vincent Jean-Louis. Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.. Critical care (London, England). 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04839-w.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.