Advances in laboratory medicine · 2023
Determination of ertapenem in plasma and ascitic fluid by UHPLC-MS/MS in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rigo-Bonnin Raúl, Amador Alberto, Núñez-Gárate María, Mas-Bosch Virgínia, Padullés Ariadna, Cobo-Sacristán Sara, Castellote José
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is a frequent severe complication in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Carbapenem antibiotics are currently the treatment of choice for patients with hospital-acquired or healthcare-related infections. However, there is limited evidence available on the efficacy of ertapenem in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. As a result, the pharmacokynetics and pharmacodynamics of this antibiotic are still unknown. The objective of this study was to develop and validate measurement procedures based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) to determine ertapenem concentrations in plasma and ascitic fluid.
METHODS: Samples were pretreated by acetronile protein-precipitation. Chromatographic separation is performed on a C18 reversed-phase Acquity®-UPLC®-BEHTM column (2.1 × 100 mm id, 1.7 µm) using a non-linear gradient of water/acetonitrile containing 0.1 % of formic acid at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Ertapenem and its internal standard (ertapenem-D4) are detected by tandem mass spectrometry using positive electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring, and using 476.2 → 346.0/432.2 as mass transition for ertapenem and 480.2 → 350.0 for its internal standard.
RESULTS: No significant interferences or carry-over contamination were observed. Imprecisions, absolute relative bias, matrix effects and normalized recoveries were ≤14.5 %, ≤9.3 % (92.8-104.5) % and (98.8-105.8) %, respectively. Chromatographic measurement procedures were linear from (0.50-100) mg/L.
CONCLUSIONS: The measurement procedures based on UHPLC-MS/MS developed and validated in this study could be useful in pharmacokynetic and pharmacodynamic studies in subjects with liver cirrhosis who develop spontaneous bacterial peritonitis treated with ertapenem.
METHODS: Samples were pretreated by acetronile protein-precipitation. Chromatographic separation is performed on a C18 reversed-phase Acquity®-UPLC®-BEHTM column (2.1 × 100 mm id, 1.7 µm) using a non-linear gradient of water/acetonitrile containing 0.1 % of formic acid at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Ertapenem and its internal standard (ertapenem-D4) are detected by tandem mass spectrometry using positive electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring, and using 476.2 → 346.0/432.2 as mass transition for ertapenem and 480.2 → 350.0 for its internal standard.
RESULTS: No significant interferences or carry-over contamination were observed. Imprecisions, absolute relative bias, matrix effects and normalized recoveries were ≤14.5 %, ≤9.3 % (92.8-104.5) % and (98.8-105.8) %, respectively. Chromatographic measurement procedures were linear from (0.50-100) mg/L.
CONCLUSIONS: The measurement procedures based on UHPLC-MS/MS developed and validated in this study could be useful in pharmacokynetic and pharmacodynamic studies in subjects with liver cirrhosis who develop spontaneous bacterial peritonitis treated with ertapenem.