BMC emergency medicine · 2024
Evaluation of droperidol use in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis of QTc prolongation and adverse events.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alshehri Abdulmajeed M, Crowley Kaitlin E, Lupi Kenneth E, Kim Christine S, DeGrado Jeremy R, Marino Kaylee
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Droperidol is a first-generation antipsychotic medication that has been used for various indications in the emergency department (ED); however, its use has been controversial due to reports of QT prolongation and the risk of torsades de pointes (TdP). The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety of droperidol administration in the ED.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study, conducted at an academic level I trauma center. System-generated reports were used to identify all droperidol administrations in the ED from the time that droperidol was reintroduced to the institutional formulary on July 1, 2019 through January 31, 2023. The major safety endpoint was a composite of the incidence of QTc interval prolongation, incidence of TdP, ventricular arrhythmia, or hypotension.
RESULTS: A total of 327 administrations of droperidol were identified in 245 patients in the ED. The composite safety endpoint occurred in 30 (9.1%) administrations. None of these events were classified as "probable" or "definite" on the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale. No episodes of TdP or serious ventricular arrhythmia were reported. Higher cumulative droperidol dose and creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min were associated with an increased odds of developing QTc prolongation (OR 1.27 [CI 1.04-1.56]) and (OR 1.01 [CI 1.0-1.02]), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The study supports the use of low dose droperidol for various indications in the ED. There were no serious adverse events reported that could be directly attributed to droperidol use; however, it is crucial to consider the potential dose dependent impact on QTc prolongation.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study, conducted at an academic level I trauma center. System-generated reports were used to identify all droperidol administrations in the ED from the time that droperidol was reintroduced to the institutional formulary on July 1, 2019 through January 31, 2023. The major safety endpoint was a composite of the incidence of QTc interval prolongation, incidence of TdP, ventricular arrhythmia, or hypotension.
RESULTS: A total of 327 administrations of droperidol were identified in 245 patients in the ED. The composite safety endpoint occurred in 30 (9.1%) administrations. None of these events were classified as "probable" or "definite" on the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale. No episodes of TdP or serious ventricular arrhythmia were reported. Higher cumulative droperidol dose and creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min were associated with an increased odds of developing QTc prolongation (OR 1.27 [CI 1.04-1.56]) and (OR 1.01 [CI 1.0-1.02]), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The study supports the use of low dose droperidol for various indications in the ED. There were no serious adverse events reported that could be directly attributed to droperidol use; however, it is crucial to consider the potential dose dependent impact on QTc prolongation.