Hospital-acquired complications in critically ill patients.
Аннотация
Background
The national hospital-acquired complications (HAC) system has been promoted as a method to identify health care errors that may be mitigated by clinical interventions.
Objectives
To quantify the rate of HAC in multiday stay adults admitted to major hospitals.
Design
Retrospective observational analysis of 5-year (July 2014 - June 2019) administrative dataset abstracted from medical records.
Setting
All 47 hospitals with on-site intensive care units (ICUs) in the State of Victoria.
Participants
All adults (aged ≥ 18 years) stratified into planned or unplanned, surgical or medical, ICU or other ward, and by hospital peer group (tertiary referral, metropolitan, regional). Main outcome measures: HAC rates in ICU compared with ward, and mixed-effects regression estimates of the association between HAC and i) risk of clinical deterioration, and ii) admission hospital site (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.3).
Results
211 120 adult ICU separations with mean hospital mortality of 7.3% (95% CI, 7.2-7.4%) reported 110 132 (42.6%) HAC events (commonly, delirium, infection, arrhythmia and respiratory failure) in 62 945 records (29.8%). Higher HAC rates were reported in elective (cardiac [50.3%] and non-cardiac [40.6%]) surgical subgroups compared with emergency medical subgroup (23.9%), and in tertiary (35.4%) compared with non-tertiary (22.7%) hospitals. HAC was strongly associated with on-admission patient characteristics (P < 0.001), but was weakly associated with hospital site (ICC, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.05-0.11).
Conclusions
Critically ill patients have a high burden of HAC events, which appear to be associated with patient admission characteristics. HAC may an indicator of hospital admission complexity rather than hospital-acquired complications.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.